Proximity: Relationships, Records, e-Health - Person-centredness near and far

When data protection and confidentiality is debated "the need to know" is often wheeled out as a rationale for access to personal identifiable data.

See the following:
NHS Confidentiality Consultation - FIPR Response (esp. #18).
DoH, Confidentiality, UK

In addition, if I need to access the record of patient held at hospital 'x' from hospital 'y' what is the health care relationship that prompts and justifies this need?

At present visiting nursing and care homes, you go knowing that data capture and recording (care assessment) is a fundamental requirement. Having a secure laptop for community has long been promised. While tech solutions are available and implemented elsewhere, my lack of such technology prompts me to imagine a future visit. ...

Pulling up at the nursing home I walk up the drive, ring the bell. While I wait the new tablet device in its bag has already introduced itself to the home. As I am allowed in - my identity assured - the tablet continues its dialogue, it:

1. Downloads and updates existing active client data.
2. Downloads additional data as per the agreed dataset on the new referral.
3. Checks on items 1-2 with a review of recent prescribing for key psychotropic medicines.
4. It checks the most recent NICE, Cochrane evidence and reconciling the local care knowledge. (This may seem excessive at present, but come personalised medicine this will be crucial).
5. Will check on most recent clinical reviews and due dates.
6. The h2cm template is there ;-) ready to present the care domain summary for the general physician ... and possibly (roles?) the next care professional to visit this home and this resident.

The significance of relationships is usually denoted by distance. Personal space is rather obviously spatial. This is how we recognise (well one of the ways!) the meaning and significance of an intimate relationship. In care situations with individuals who are confused and potentially aggressive we are conscious of the need to have due regard and respect for that person's personal space. Spaces and boundaries have to be negotiated in a variety of ways and means. 

Health information technology has already made effective use of role-based access to systems. If we take person-centred care to the nth degree, proximity can also count as it does in mobile health (m-health). Whilst to effect a role is to be in a certain location and context (sat at the office PC in the hospital) roles are organisationally and politically defined. Proximity is also contextual and situated in other ways, my proximity to:

• the nursing home;
• the individual's room;
• the individual themselves.
• (and their relatives)

While telecare / informatics can deliver a dividend in remote care, it is essential that it can also demonstrably support person-centred care. The best way (clinically assured) to do that for many activities is person-to-person contact. Just because one-side of the relationship may not recall the encounter as little as five minutes after, does not mean that there is no value in sustaining the ring of the bell, the exchange of s-miles, the record that results and other background conversations.

Image source:
Gestalt - proximity
http://graphicdesign.spokanefalls.edu/tutorials/process/gestaltprinciples/gestaltprinc.htm