RCN Foundation: Investigating Learning Disability Nurses’ Perceptions of Registration with the Nursing Midwifery Council -

and wider Impact on RNLD Nursing Students
and People living with an Intellectual Disability

From twitter: Dr Lorraine Henshaw RN PD. https://x.com/lor_henshaw

'Are you a Learning Disability Nurse who is no longer registered with the NMC? Would you be happy to discuss your experiences with us for our important research into the RNLD role. See contact details below for further info. Please also share with your networks !' 

'This study ‘Investigating Learning Disability Nurses’ Perceptions of Registration with the Nursing Midwifery Council and wider Impact on RNLD Nursing Students and People living with an Intellectual Disability’ Study Aim and Objectives 1.To investigate RNLD perceptions of registration with the NMC and their thoughts about the impact on RN:D nurses on people living with an intellectual disability and thoughts regarding the future of RNLD nurses a)Obj 1- to ascertain where LD nurses are working and in what capacity/role. b)Obj 2- To explore the impact of this work on their identity as a RNLD 2.To investigate student RNLD nurses’ experiences of practice placements and perception of the role of RNLD nurses a)Obj- to understand the impact of the reduction of RNLD registered nurses (with the NMC) on the future workforce 3.To examine the impact that RNLDs have on people living with an intellectual disability and their families/carers. a)Obj- To explore the perceptions of service users and carers of the value of the RNLD.'

Site: https://salford-repository.worktribe.com/project/3385884/rcn-foundation-investigating-learning-disability-nurses-perceptions-of-registration-with-the-nursing-midwifery-council-and-wider-impact-on-rnld-nursing-students-and-people-living-with-an-intellectual-disability

Call for focus group participants: the records of adopted and care-experienced people -

– additional retention guidance for
record-keepers and care professionals

Could you help update retention guidance for record-keepers and care professionals by joining a focus group in November?

Care-experienced and adopted people, archivists & records managers and social workers are invited to participate in an online focus group to shape updated and detailed improvements in retaining care-experienced and adopted people’s records in England and Wales. This has been identified as a critical need by many recent reports including IICSA.

We recently published Guidance on the Records of Adopted and Care-Experienced People (Feb 2024) which sets out best practice, to improve consistency across England and Wales. We are a participative and inclusionary project led by members of the Chief Archivists in Local Government Group (CALGG), independent consultants and academics and professionals working in the records management, data protection and access to records fields, in the charitable and local government sectors. Some of our project members are adopted or care-experienced people.

Focus groups will take place on

Weds 13 Nov 11am-12.30

Mon 18 Nov 2-3.30pm

Thurs 28 Nov 2-3.30pm.

We will meet on Zoom: you will be able to join in your web browser, no zoom account or desktop app/licence is required.

Further information

The Guidance is aimed at people responsible for creating, managing, and providing access to care and adoption records. It includes the viewpoints of care-experienced people and adopted people to give practitioners a greater understanding of their experiences, needs and the challenges they face. The Guidance highlights that all organisations should have an up-to-date policy covering all records relating to children, young people and their families, together with procedures and plans to implement the policy including up-to-date retention schedules. Retention schedules recommend how long to keep different types of records. Each record type should have a retention period based on best practice, legislation, business need or a combination of these. Schedules also include how and when the retention period is triggered, and what should happen at the end of the period: typically either confidential destruction, or being kept permanently.

A retention period of [at] least 125 years from date of birth for case files and preferably 150 years as exemplary practice is recommended in the Guidance. However it also recommends the permanent preservation of these records with an option for people to opt out in the case of their own records.

These recommendations are made because many care-experienced or adopted people reconstruct their personal histories by turning to the records created about them by social workers and care providers. Thousands of requests to view records for this purpose are made each year in England and Wales. The records – a “paper self” - have significant impacts on a care-experienced person throughout their life. However, accessing records is often difficult, both practically and emotionally, and can be traumatic and dehumanizing. Records have been kept inconsistently across the public, private, and voluntary care sectors, affecting outcomes for individuals. Across England and Wales the records of adopted and care-experienced people who are formally classified as ‘looked-after people’ should be kept for 100 and 75 years respectively, but there are no permanent preservation protections for records in law. Moreover, some care-experienced people are omitted from the requirement for records to be retained. In addition, there are now many records sitting in digital systems which do not have a proper data migration/preservation strategy.

My Source: To view the list archives go to: https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?A0=RECORDS-MANAGEMENT-UK