To be
in a state of disarray, is to be disarmed, without access to
resources, or at least having an impaired ability to organise strategically
for reasons of defence, disputation or argument. Constructive debate
will be hard to achieve and so the confusion continues.
Prior to 2013 ideas for a paper with a
would-be co-author began. Early that year there were 5000 words. There's probably mention of (another!) project on these pages –
somewhere/when? The focus was using Hodges' model to explore 'scope
of practice' in nursing. As the conceptual gift that keeps giving,
Hodges' model can encompass all health disciplines, curricula, and professions, informal caring and
social care too.
This post is prompt-ed (human
‘intelligence’ needs a nudge too) by ‘discussion’ on what was twitter, and currently on ‘X’. So in turn I can reflect on how relevant
this paper would be today.
I still have that draft of over 5000 words. It is now woefully
out-of-date. Out-of-date? Well the available job postings across the health and care sectors, have always changed. If you scan the paper copies of Nursing Times, Nursing Standard, Nursing Mirror (anyone?) and the BMJ, The Lancet, Health Service Journal over three-four decades the evidence is clear. Then try the e-media, (and with it AI!)?
Now, for several years the impacts of policy and change in advanced nursing practice, plus associate roles, that have also been applied in medical training and education are coming home to roost. Depending on your corner, and position in the debate there's a position called 'Noctor' (Vaughan and Kar, 2026).
I find it regrettable that consultants and 'senior' nurses have taken corners, as policy results in grossly negative examples with potentially safety consequences. There has always been a 'distance' to be bridged between health disciplines. In the past any sense of competition was usually, and so constructively patient-centred - grounded in the delivery and quality of care. The contest was tempered through mutual respect and dignity, and recognition of respective roles, knowledge, abilities and contribution to what is (and remains?) the multidisciplinary team?
Now with technology and AI in the mix, maintaining goodwill, common-sense and keeping the patient, public and future generations in sight will need a degree of diplomacy as yet not called-upon.
This made me think of the unions in the 1970s and more recent examples of work-to-rule.
As health professionals argue between themselves, what is the cost of distraction?
Yes, that paper using Hodges' model on 'scope of practice (and theory!)' would be timely now.
In fact, it is urgently needed.
Vaughan L, Kar P. Vexatious complaints are being weaponised to discourage debate BMJ 2026; 394 :e100697 doi:10.1136/bmj-2026-100697
Previously: 'scope' : 'publications'
orcid.org/0000-0002-0192-8965
