Identity: Plain to see? A little thought experiment
INTERPERSONAL : SCIENCES
|
A little thought experiment:
Beneath the humanistic-mechanistic axis (within the sociological and political domains) superimpose an inverted global population pyramid - scaled to fit - of course. Make it dynamic if you wish.
Then imagine lifting just one individual out of the global population. As our subject, of whatever age, sex ... place them anywhere above the horizontal axis. Anywhere within the interpersonal or sciences domains. There they are: a single data unit. Selected at random, of course, their health status would vary accordingly.
Would we actually be able to see them here? One single vertical line, at this scale?
A case of individual ineffability. Welcome to the ethical debate re. the individual and collective. And yet there they are? The focus of their own self-care and independence, famine, conflict ... or our care. Not just 'us', as a nurse, doctor, social worker, support worker ... but intermittently, the whole health and social care team.
From being lost in anonymity, literally a number in a chart, to having a name, several identities - with or without 'papers' - needs, background, character, personality, problems, relationships, strengths and humanity.
Hodges' model provides an incredible conceptual estate for us to utilise, if we choose to.
We can refer back instantly as context and population pyramids demand to parent, guardian, partner, family.
Previously: 'population' : 'identity'


orcid.org/0000-0002-0192-8965
