Re. Ockenden Report
Catching up on the newspapers, I noticed in the Times reporting of Ockenden calling for midwives to train as nurses first. Provoking debate about nurse education.
Within maternity services there are problems with continuity of care and skills in dealing with complex cases:
'Maternal Deaths
60. The Review examined 27 maternal deaths that occurred between 2006-2024. Five cases fell outside
of the Terms of Reference of the Review. Of the 22 remaining cases, reviewers identified failures in
care that may have or substantially impacted on the outcome in six deaths.
61. The profile of maternal deaths at NUH over this period broadly aligned with the known demographics
and causes as identified by MBRRACE. 11 of the deaths occurred to women living in the most
deprived areas of the city and 14 occurred amongst women who were not white British.
62. The common failures reviewers identified that might prevent future maternal deaths included:
listening to women and families and acting promptly on concerns; continuity of care particularly
for those with additional social/medical complexities; robust clinical governance to ensure timely
information sharing across organisations and prompt access to imaging for women presenting with
concerning neurological symptoms.' xiv
AI Overview (Ecosia) suggests that although direct entry to midwifery has always been possible(?), the English National Board created the pathway some 39 years ago.
The Ockenden Report describes how in combination health systems, culture, leadership and training can contribute to compassion fatigue (p.313).
When you look at Hodges' model and our languages, a great many challenges for curricula, training and education programmes can be found. The most powerful of what can be progressive, or threats are invariably mechanistic:
- shorten
- bypass
- shortcut
- cutting corners
- short-circuit
Nursing must always move forward, continuous professional development is built on this principle. In the late 70s and 1980s post-registered qualifications were held in high esteem. Especially midwifery, paediatrics, health visiting, emergency and intensive care.
Clearly, decision and policymakers can underestimate the value of basic nurse training. Having an idea since childhood is brilliant, but at interview saying you're compassionate and want to make a difference will soon be tested. Sometimes as a student rather bluntly, as with a first placement in forensic nursing. I wonder how many students have been lost there? I'm sure the majority will cope, manage, enjoy and prosper, but I've seen the student peers who miss these cohort members on subsequent learning experiences. What preparation is employed?
Basic nurse training, is just that. Demonstrating competence in communication, awareness of basic needs and how these are expressed behaviourally. What interpersonal skills and knowledge are needed. As highlighted before, the director of nurse education worried about those of us who worked as nursing assistants risked being trained in poor care. Not recognising 'bad practice', a 'poor attitude', not using observation and most important of all listening: to what is said and unsaid. When I started I remember thinking about not responding - as individually programmed to do so, through a reflex action. That was a worry back then.
While the news in the Ockenden Report is bleak. The depth of the report (for me) is manifest in identification of not only socioeconomic factors, but sociotechnical too (with five mentions) and the critical interplay of seeing (and hearing!) the individual amid the collective:
'2. Fetal monitoring
Rather than reflecting simple failures of individual interpretation, growing evidence suggests that
intrapartum fetal monitoring is best understood as a complex sociotechnical practice, shaped by system
design, workload, team dynamics, guideline variability and organisational culture.119 Continuous CTG itself
has well-recognised limitations, including poor specificity for predicting long-term neonatal outcomes and
substantial inter- and intra-observer variation in interpretation.5
Reviews of intrapartum care are therefore
unavoidably influenced by retrospective bias, with greater apparent clarity afforded by knowledge of the
outcome than was available to clinicians at the time.
However, despite this, a sociotechnical understanding does not negate the importance of examining
individual cases in which intrapartum monitoring was demonstrably substandard. National inquiries and
confidential reviews repeatedly describe cases involving sustained failure to recognise pathological fetal
heart-rate patterns, delayed escalation despite repeated triggers, and missed opportunities for timely
intervention. 2,3,120,121 These cases cannot be explained solely by the inherent limitations of CTG or by
hindsight bias.' p.143.
It is quite shocking to hear this conclusion: the need to train as a nurse first. Counterarguments: where is the evidence(?!) - have followed. But then if you undervalue and miss the fundamentals (see Hodges' model!) then individuals, families, communities, students, practitioners, services and systems suffer.
Previously: 'maternity' : 'report' : 'safety'
orcid.org/0000-0002-0192-8965
