More pennies - drop ... A personal note

*

Quite a while back on twitter, someone took exception as I replied to a tweet. The specifics aren't important, what is, is how much I take for granted here. 

The suggestion was that h2cm is, gives credence to, accentuates ... the 'general' at the expense of the specific, specialist, advanced. This [Hodges' model] is BAD.

As regards Hodges' model this is plain false, wrong.

Are specialists, advanced practitioners 'born' fully formed?

As I have always tried to remember my days as a Nursing Assistant, we must remember students and across disciplines.

Some comments, by new students on placement also on twitter suggest this is sadly, not the case.

I think I replied again in the thread, highlighting h2cm's open, situated, context driven potential.

In reality people on twitter are patient; I'm muted; the cliques, click away; whatever. As I churn out the same images and phrases.

What I need to do [yes, I know!], and will from now on, is qualify 'generic conceptual framework' (which on a Saturday night [UK] is probably a turn-off for many 😘).

As your knowledge grows, and is pruned by new learning, experience (and time) so your conceptual knowledge and vocabulary changes - expertise.

Hodges' model can reflect this.

So, if you are a specialist - and new here - WELCOME! 

Here are four pools, choose yours and by all means: DIVE IN.

Don't worry. IT IS SAFE.

At least, you won't hit the bottom, and you may not even find the sides. 😉

If your field is theology, the spiritual - well, well, you are in for a real treat.

*I love this journey^

^to follow ...