Hodges' Model: Welcome to the QUAD: determinants

Hodges' model is a conceptual framework to support reflection and critical thinking. Situated, the model can help integrate all disciplines (academic and professional). Amid news items, are posts that illustrate the scope and application of the model. A bibliography and A4 template are provided in the sidebar. Welcome to the QUAD ...

Showing posts with label determinants. Show all posts
Showing posts with label determinants. Show all posts

Tuesday, December 30, 2025

Beyond Empathy to System Change: Four Poems on Health by Bertolt Brecht

The canalization of a river 
The grafting of a fruit tree 
The education of a person 
The reconstruction of a state. 
These are all instances of a fruitful critique 
And they are also
 Instances of art. 
—Bertolt Brecht, “On the Critical Attitude”


Individual
|
      INTERPERSONAL    :     SCIENCES               
HUMANISTIC  --------------------------------------  MECHANISTIC      
 SOCIOLOGY  :    POLITICAL 
|
Group
'The education of a person'


'The canalization of a river
The grafting of a fruit tree'
 

'These are all instances of a fruitful critique
And they are also
Instances of art.'
—Bertolt Brecht,
“On the Critical Attitude”

 


'The reconstruction of a state.'




MacGregor, W., Horn, M. & Raphael, D. Beyond Empathy to System Change: Four Poems on Health by Bertolt Brecht. J Med Humanit 45, 53–77 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10912-023-09801-5

My source: 

Politics of Health Group Mail List Messages
Visit PoHG on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/282761111845400
Follow us on Twitter: @pohguk
You can subscribe to / unsubscribe from the PoHG mail list here: http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/POHG
And SDOH list - https://listserv.yorku.ca/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=sdoh&A=1

See also: 'drama' : 'empathy' : 'poetry' : 'change' : 'art'

Wednesday, December 10, 2025

Problem solving, case formulation and policy formulation

On W2tQ this year, and possibly in a previous paper, or conference presentation, I've stated that the nursing process is basically a problem solving algorithm. Nothing profound there of course. 

'Problem solving' is a developmental threshold and an evolutionary skill obvious in humans, with learning passed on across generations. Evidence of problem solving in animals and nature is becoming increasingly apparent; with examples over recent decades of problems solved not witnessed before.

In healthcare, and psychotherapy more specifically, we shift to case formulation. Again a step-wise process to arise at a sufficiently complete rationale for therapy. Ideally, this extends beyond the individual. As an parent, grandparent, guardian, teacher, supervisor ... teaches a child so therapy is an opportunity for learning and, it must be added, unlearning.

Returning to (and passing on):

Hague, R., & Harrop, M. (2007). Comparative Government and Politics (7th ed.). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.

Chapter 18 (pp.377-395) concerns 'Public Policy'. Clearly, here there is a shift from the individual to the collective, population and citizenry. The chapter's second page on 'Initiation and Formulation' quickly provides a flowchart 'Figure 18.1 Stages of the policy process'. Box 18.1 informs readers about 'Rational and incremental models and policy-making' (p.380):
'The key contrast between the two models is this. The rational model views policy formulation as emerging from a systematic search for the most efficient means of achieving defined goals. By contrast, the incremental model sees policy as emerging from a compromise between actors who have goals which are ill-defined or even contradictory. Where the rational model seeks the best policy in theory, an incremental framework seeks out a practical policy acceptable to all the interests involved.' p.380.
The book highlights Simon (1983) as a source for the rational or synoptic model:
 
Simon H.A. (1983) Reason in human affairs. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

Plus, for the incremental model:

Lindblom, C.E. 1979. Still muddling, not yet through. Public Administration Review 39: 517–526.

If needed, online, you will find accounts and diagrams on problem solving, the nursing process, case formulation and policy formulation. That's quite a family is it not? 

While not referred to as explicitly today, the nursing process (now routinized) should address parity and integrate care across mental and physical health. The individual (person, patient) should be assessed and care planned with their social and community context taken into account. Collaboration in care should help assure that this is indeed the case. The nursing process in the sociological domain acknowledges the role of parents, guardians, and families as informal carers. The social care sector can also be represented and further the objectives of a more open and integrated care community as per the local situation. While not added to the sciences domain; case formulation should also factor in the physical and political. 

Politically, are all instances of problem solving, and formulation recognised for their importance and influence on outcomes and effectiveness, economy, efficiency (another 'box' p.357), plus efficacy? Are services politically afforded the resources, as defined across the domains of Hodges' model required to deliver, improve and change (achieve sustainability, educational, preventive)? 

The elephant here of course are the determinantS. Ultimately, all these forms of problem solving should be at 'home' in the political domain, but they are rarely there. It is not just the practitioner who can make the difference - be the difference.

Enough of l-implementation

Policy needs to be fit for 21st century purposes, and not hollowed-out but allowed out - beyond the legislative walls where it can make a real difference.

individual
|
INTERPERSONAL : SCIENCES
humanistic -------------------------------------------  mechanistic
SOCIOLOGY : POLITICAL
|
group-population

Nursing process

Case 
formulation

Nursing process

Nursing process

Case 
formulation


Policy
formulation

    

Saturday, December 06, 2025

The critical pathway leads to ...?

I missed the most salient information on this book's cover - at least for me. My copy is secondhand, but I picked the copy up recalling Dr Walsh's many publications on models of nursing.

The critical pathway for me is plural. It would include, the CPN(Cert.) course when I first encountered Hodges' model in 1987-8. Plus the fact that the pathway is not unidirectional, with some backward steps and reviews, but is multifold. Running the axes of Hodges' model to - pre-op, surgery, post-op, rehab ... we can add the whole corpus of nursing, social, self, and global health care.

The cover is of course illustrative, intended to support the title and suggest an explicit critical pathway. Apart from possibly pointing to collaboration "Mr Jones ... Let us discuss your critical pathway!" what has changed? Since the book's publication in 1997, we need health care services and systems to be sustainable. We are bit late here. Mr Jones is already a 'patient', bedecked in dressing gown and slippers.


This critical pathway needs to be replaced by one informed and oriented towards Mr Jones as self-caring citizen. This is of course easier said than done in policy terms. While governments globally and institutions stress the need for health literacy, informed life style choices, self-care, health promotion and prevention how much progress is being made? Nutrition remains a profound issue.*

The environmental challenges of climate change, pollution and waste disposal are seemingly contested even as the effects and cost of non-action are increasingly obvious.

The policy of 'care in the community' even while incomplete in the community, has provided me with a stimulating, challenging and rewarding career 1985 ... In the 21st century though, we have to ask of the assessment of mobility to follow and effort of the up-hill walk to 'home' begs the critical pathway that is now Planetary Health.

<>

Several points from Walsh (1997):
'Introducing a model to a clinical area is not an easy task to be undertaken lightly, as it involves fundamental changes in the way staff think and work. Luker (1988) has suggested that each nurse carries around their own informal model of nursing which guides their practice. It is probable that a formal model will be significantly different, although these differences can be minimized by full consultation and involvement with staff to ensure that the model chosen reflects their views of nursing as far as possible.' p.36.
Hodges' model can be 'carried around'. In truth it not strictly a model of nursing. Its scope extends beyond nursing and yet the model can incorporate thought about the patient, nurse, environment and what health, illness, recovery and self-care entail. Hodges' model is meta-cognitive and meta-conceptual, and (very) capable of mapping the terrain (p.26) of nursing from these and other perspectives. A nurse's 'views of nursing' will be dictated by the situation presented to them. Hodges' model can be retrospective, prospective and operate in the here-and-now: situated.
'There is a further point, however, that follows on from Luker's observation for expert nurses have an internalized model of care which is unique to them, it is possible that they may have internalized some practices which are outdated, taken for granted or inappropriate (Paley, 1996) but which are never made explicit as their care is not based upon a commonly understood model of nursing. This notion of every nurse having their own model therefore can lead to the situation where outdated rituals can be propagated under the guise of expert practice. Having a series of explicit models whose aims and ideas are common knowledge, shared by all, opens up care to critical scrutiny in a way that is not possible if each nurse has their own private internal model.' p.37.

Hodges' model can be used with other models, conceptual frameworks and systems across disiplines. Hodges' model is not intended to be prescriptive or prospective. It can be utilised for learning and unlearning. As a registered General Nurse who studied in the 1980s this does not mean I would be competent and safe to practice now. Continuing professional development, mandatory training and revalidation of nursing registration are all geared to support professional practice that has currency, validity, and is safe.

If nursing ever needed a commonly understood model ...?

'It will be apparent from the previous sections that use of a model will lead nursing into some new and unfamiliar territory that will involve seeing the patient in a more holistic fashion'. p.63.

'The nurse may find that models start to identify environmental problems whose solutions lie beyond the boundaries of nursing at present. This is particularly true of the community nurse.' p.63.
Walsh's concern here is the immediate community, but we can recognise the prescience of environmental problems here. Plus the need for the POLITICAL domain in Hodges' model:
'On a larger scale still, perhaps some patient's problems have their origins in political decisions made by national govemment or perhaps it is the factory down the road producing unacceptable levels of pollution. If nursing models make us recognize the political and environmental causes of some patient problems, there should ee no logical reason why nursing should not go forward into theee arenas as a legitimate part of nursing intervention.' p.63.
'There are senior NHS managers and health academics in so-called 'policy thínk tanks' who simply do not recognize the value of nursing and see only a collection of simpie tasks which anybody with an NVQ level 2 can perform. Nursing therefore has to demonstrate its worth; it has to evaluate what it is doing for patients.
Here it is important to remember that the care given may be very different from what is written down. Consequently, how a nurse evaluates care mentally may be very different from how this care is recorded in nursing process documentation. ...' p.64.
Hodges' model can (imho) have a role in argumentation for the quality and scope of healthcare, for nursing as a profession, evaluating and assuring nursing's values in the constant that are the demands of complexity and change. The (several) determinants of health are the other constant.

Mike Walsh (1997) Models and Critical Pathways in Clinical Nursing. London: Bailliere Tindall.

Luker K. (1988) Do Models Work? Nursing Times, 84 (5), 27-29.

Paley, J. (1996), Intuition and expertise: comments on the Benner debate. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 23: 665-671. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.1996.tb00035.x

*Jones P, Wirnitzer K. Hodges’ model: the Sustainable Development Goals and public health – universal health coverage demands a universal framework. BMJ Nutrition, Prevention & Health 2022;5: doi:10.1136/bmjnph-2021-000254

Wirnitzer KC, Motevalli M, Tanous DR, Drenowatz C, Moser M, Cramer H, Rosemann T, Wagner K-H, Michalsen A, Knechtle B, Fras Z, Ritskes-Hoitinga M, Marques A, Mis NF, Stanford FC, Schubert C, Goswami N, Leitzmann C, Fredriksen PM, Ruedl G, Wilflingseder D, Lima RA, Kessler C, Jeitler M, Khan NA, Joulaei H, Fatemi M, Knight A, Kratky KW, Palmer KK, Haditsch B, Jakse B, Kofler W, Pfeiffer T, Cordova-Pozo K, Tortella P, Straub S, Lynch H, Schätzer M, Krishnan A, Fathima A. S, Gatterer L, Kriwan F, Abhishek M, Nandgaonkar H, Nandgaonkar S, Adedara AO, Haro JM, Gericke C, Neumann G, Akhtar A, Rashidlamir A, Thangavelu M, Ngoumou GB, Perpék É, Klaper M, Bhattacharya B, Kirschner W, Bessems KMHH, Jones P, Peoples G, Bescos R, Duftner C, Seifert G (2025). Toward a roadmap for addressing today's health dilemma–The 101-statement consensus report., 
Frontiers in Nutrition, Volume 12:1676080. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2025.1676080. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2025.1676080

Monday, August 04, 2025

Book: v 'Health and Health Care Inequities'


This final post for HHCI takes in -
Chapter 7: Searching for Socialism
Chapter 8: Mobilizing for Health Equity.

These themes are preceded at the close of chapter 6 with Arnel sharing some personal background, as an immigrant to Canada from a racialized background, who has worked in the health care industry (p.96). COVID also features again, its effects still resonate socio-politically.

It is an unfortunate conjunction - relationship as far as socialism, social justice, the green movement and social cohesion are concerned but Borras provides an invaluable service in linking the Capital-State alliance, which I have capitalised. It seems to be appropriate?

There is 'something' here (I think) in the 'identity' of governments, administrations - I will work through elsewhere.

Having added a note in post iv on expropriation, I see that 'precarity' is also included (p.98).

Chapter 7 gets to grips with 'Welfare Systems in Capitalism'. As before the details are Canadian, but with global reference to other welfare systems - liberal, conservative, and social democratic. If Marxism - Socialism was once feared for its seismic potential, I wondered if chapter 7 points to socialism being in a dormant state? Borras explains welfare state evolution and influences and employs metrics of trade union density, low-wage rates, poverty rates, and infant-mortality rates. On low-wages reference to the US as a capitalist powerhouse that does not provide a favourable environment for most workers, added to my thoughts about nursing globally and the US specifically: despite my parochial vantage point. Five tables aid international comparisons, with inconsistencies in data also highlighted. I couldn't help but feel the need to consider the impact of the wider-determinants of health. Now  undoubtedly, an emerging field. The discussion on infant mortality prompts thoughts of my daughter a mum-to-be amid health news in the UK. Plus, Labour's previous and renewed efforts in Sure Start; and the need stressed through Hodges' model to focus on ALL the literacies, including health.  

It sounds a contradiction but HHCI frequently had me thinking 'BIG picture' and detail. Reading 'US Empire' (p.110) made me wonder what descriptor might have been applied if written in June 2025? Social democracies are called to account. As a community nurse I am ready to support someone in making a change. But they must want and be the agent of that change. I can't support the individual in their drinking to excess - in the case of alcohol misuse/dependency. Social democracies and capitalism can operate as a conspiratorial dyad, limiting social and welfare progression. The lessons here are invaluable (pp.110-113). 

More could be made of the specific political impacts of technology. But clearly that would be another book. For example, no excuse, but BIG-TECH were clearly determined to start[-up] as they intended to go. They had a 'cleanroom' - clean-slate as far as unionisation was concerned. Governments permitted the same - paving the way, enabling and across continents. Ironic, the touchy-feely "We Care" with 'amazing offices', work cafés, dog areas, cycle paths, gardens, breakout spaces, and views. "Now, it is almost a religion: 'Give me a company until it is seven ...'. 

As socialism tries to overcome the past, and its associations; a political movement is needed. Somehow 'new socialism' sounds dated. There a call for openess in new ideas and ways to realise socialism. Over the past two decades work has changed, zero-hour contracts, part-time contracts, the rise of employment agencies and self-employed workers. It appears 'complex adaptive systems' can explain and help solve many problems, extending to human organisation and government. Yes. 'It is crucial to understand people's situations and value their experiences.' But how? And, how to 'encourage open conversations and learn from each other.' (p.114)? Neither 'citizen', or 'assemblies' are in the index, as with gambling and advertising. I may have missed one, or more in the text. You have a sense of a need for international organisation. Especially, with AI - artificial intelligence also in the wings.

The results of Erik Olin Wright's analysis of anti-capitalist movements does not sound convincing to me (pp.114-116), but then I'm a nurse. Perhaps economics itself needs to be looked at (again)? Is it an ongoing project - radical economics - that is? How does a new socio-political order 'account' for the existing distribution wealth? The paths toward health equity 1-6, make more sense. The political realism demonstrated, gives me reason to continue here. 

A brief section on electoral politics, brought me to short-termism. I have reached out to SIMPOL about this book and will share with the author.


[ Update 20/08/25: I've put the author Arnel in touch John Bunzl at SIMPOL. Short-termism remains an acute problems in our politics and policy. I've always worked clinically, so despite union and professional body membership, policy is something that has been done to my colleagues and I. There did seem some coherence with the National Service Frameworks. That may be illusory as they focussed on long-term conditions, but there was more:

Boardman J, Parsonage M. Government policy and the National Service Framework for Mental Health: modelling and costing services in England. Advances in Psychiatric Treatment. 2009;15(3):230-240. doi:10.1192/apt.bp.106.003095

They also had the attention of 'service user / carer specific organisations' -
https://mstrust.org.uk/a-z/national-service-frameworks-nsf

Last week, outside a large bookshop in Hay-on-Wye there were cabinets with books for sale at £1. With £5 worth under my arm, I was ready to go in to pay, and spotted 'Walk Don't Run' an absolute gem which I will post about soon. It links to the first post about Arnel's text and evidence. ].
Chapter 8: Mobilizing for Health Equity. Social justice: It seems the more it is spoken of (shouted even); the further it is to being delivered. We used to talk about minority and disenfranchised groups needing a 'voice'. Now social media amplifies the voice, that gets lost in the cacophony and chaos of information disorder. The 'essence of socialism' needs to quickly get to grips with capitalism as the need for 'labour' changes - is changing. We must listen to literature too: 'Some animals are more equal than others'. Class awareness and the role of unions is discussed. Education is critical. Perhaps we need more Philosophy in Pubs? People learn more effectively when they discover things, and arrive at conclusions for themselves. Use of guided discovery and Socratic dialogue have proved their worth repeatedly. This is why formative education is so important. Young people should be able to reflect and think critically. Within the education system the development of character and values too. That way: 'Workers must become political activists.' (p.126).

As a former health care worker there's a page (+) on engaging nurses in the fight for health equity. It is good to see I am probably right to assume the majority of nurses not 'politically active'. Hopefully, nurses and other formal carers reflect the local community and demographics. Although COVID revealed blatent structural realities. 

Individual
|
      INTERPERSONAL    :     SCIENCES               
HUMANISTIC  --------------------------------------  MECHANISTIC      
 SOCIOLOGY  :    POLITICAL 
|
Group

LIFE CHANCES
MY POTENTIAL
MENTAL HEALTH

PHYSICAL RESOURCES
PHYSICAL HEALTH

SOCIETY
SOCIAL RESOURCES
COMMUNITY

HEALTH ACTIVISM
ADVOCACY
POLICY CHANGE


On page 108 is '2SLGBTQIA+' below is a video that helps:


There are 'minimum demands' - Canada-centric of course. A look beyond policy change limitations and a short review of the need to establish a genuine socialist political party. This begs the question of how 'genuine' would be recognised. There may be a case study emerging in UK politics over the next four years? The bones are here in HHCI- no doubt about that.  More is needed, so it's encouraging there is no 'manifesto' in the index either.

Many thanks to Fernwood Publishing for my pb copy.

Arnel M. Borras. (2025) Health and Health Care Inequities - A Critical Political Economy Perspective. Fernwood Publishing.

See also - reference to Hodges' model:
Iris Lohja, Yves Demazeau, Christine Verdier. A multi-agent system approach to dynamic ridesharing for older people: State-of-the-art work and preliminary design. 18èmes Rencontres des Jeunes Chercheurs en Intelligence Artificielle, RJCIA’20, Jun 2020, Angers, France. pp.52-59. ⟨hal-02897446

Wednesday, July 30, 2025

Book: 'Health and Health Care Inequities' iv

Fittingly, chapter 4 brings us to Political Power and Policy Advocacy. In Hodges' model you can both have your cake; and gratefully receive the cake you're given. This is the health in politics and the health in politics (as, for example, revealed in the health status of political leaders).


As a framework structure, the axes of Hodges' model initially give rise to four symmetric domains (spaces). There is an invitation to begin where you choose. Chapter four reveals some truths, as the 'nexus' - center of the model is mobile (unlike many citizens!) as the 2x2 rendition below suggests, if not illustrates. Borras takes us through health politics, political participation and representation, unequal power and politics, and policy change approaches with illustrative cases.

In an institution (like the NHS), bureaucracy, aka an organisation, the workforce are often acutely aware of policy and procedure. It is like the Force. It permeates everything - the meetings - and yet is remote. Borras seek to shed light on unequal resources and policy influence. Again Borras's literature informed discussion and argument, includes some historical gems, such as Lasswell (1958).

Individual
|
      INTERPERSONAL    :     SCIENCES               
HUMANISTIC  --------------------------------------  MECHANISTIC      
 SOCIOLOGY  :    POLITICAL 
|
Group





Political Power and
Policy Advocacy




In chapter 5 on evidence and ideas, discussion of Katherine Smith's 'under 'Six Travelling Ideas' is an excellent resource, with several references including:

Smith, Katherine E (2013) Institutional filters : the translation and re-circulation of ideas about health inequalities within policy. Policy and Politics, 41 (1). pp. 81-100. ISSN 0305-5736 (https://doi.org/10.1332/030557312X655413).

I love the image of ideas as and on a journey, some successful, others fractured, weak, re-contextualised, even non-journeys (falling - 'dead from the press'I suppose?). At least the journey of Hodges' model is ongoing. A baton for our times. As I wrote in post i, chapter 5 tackles 'evidence' (there's a post or two). It does so in relation to information, ideology, and interests:

If you've read many posts on W2tQ, you may see: I've a chip on my shoulder. Evidence for the safety, benefits, theoretical underpinning ... of Hodges' model is still to be realised. To the satisfaction, that is: of course to the powers that be. Speaking of which: the axial (for me) subtitles arise again in chapter 6; capitalism-imperialism-colonialism-racism nexus (p.87).

To demonstrate the utility of Hodges' model, this is significant.

Please feel free to search for these terms - capitalism-imperialism-colonialism-racism in the search bar above.

I've been interested in drama since playing the part of Francis Nurse in Miller's The Crucible. It took some 50 years to go from armchair to treading the boards again. I played Ken, supported by his wife, trying to run a post office, amid a chaotic and injurious IT system. An 8-9 minute sketch which was part of a Living Newspaper. Interested in writing - as previous posts may reveal, I also keep trying get to the theatre. With the themes of chapter 6, Liberation was thought provoking.

Mind-Body, Private-Public, Socialist-Conservative, Borras adds the global health North-South schism. A prompt for suggesting a brief glossary is expropriation and exploitation^ (p.88). Four stages of capitalism too. This chapter - A critical political economy approach is essential reading for me (and you!?) - a path to a critical care economy (self-care to planetary health).

^There is a note #3 about these on page 99.

See also: Post i : Post ii : Post iii : Post v (to follow)

Merelman, R. M. (1981). Harold D. Lasswell’s Political World: Weak Tea for Hard Times. British Journal of Political Science, 11(4), 471–497. http://www.jstor.org/stable/193766

Arnel M. Borras. (2025) Health and Health Care Inequities - A Critical Political Economy Perspective. Fernwood Publishing.

Liberation image: The Agency
https://theagency.co.uk/news/cast-announced-for-ntombizodwa-nyonis-liberation-at-royal-exchange/

Tuesday, July 29, 2025

Book: iii 'Health and Health Care Inequities'


This book, or similar should be read by 3rd year student nurses and other healthcare learners. I wondered if, for students, a brief glossary might be useful. But key terms are explained and clearly, with typologies numbered and expanded when needed. There seems an aversion in nursing academia to avoid the acutely 'political'. Even though of course in psychiatry, the need for considersation of human rights, consent, capacity, law, personal and public safety, risk is inevitable. Should we only learn of the politics of our role on a post-registration/license course of learning? As mentioned in post i, Borras duly notes the asymmetric impact COVID. The disproportinate deaths of frontline healthcare workers from ethnic minority groups (UK). A sign of the impact, is reflected in COVID recurring through the text.

The device of using axes, e.g. Class-Gender-Health (p.11) rightly draws in commentary on nutrition, pay gaps - heterosexual white men, terms of employment, and design and occupational health for woman. Gender politics is also reflected in the text. The relational dimensions of this discussion also stands out. The Class-Race-Health axis (had me return to the question of parity, but beyond the mental - physical divide. 

These axes employed by Borras seemingly traverse a path and are extensible (across pages). Briefly, in Hodges' model the domains and axes act as stepping stones: 

We can ‘walk’ the model:

Humanistic INTERPERSONAL Individual SCIENCES Mechanistic: adding - Humanistic SOCIOLOGY Group POLITICAL Mechanistic 

A global perspective is matained, even though the focus is Canadian health, government, policy and policy. The press have often highlighted the global nature of the housing crisis. Canada is not immune; as discussed in chapter 2. For what is in many nations a 'housing disaster', Borras covers the history too. Reflecting on: 
'Around the world, neoliberal programs have resulted in over a billion people living in slums (Davis 2017, 23). In wealthier countries, there was rampant privatization of social housing units.' p.25. 
- you feel like a nodding dog toy. Where is the leadership, the strategy and integrity to provide housing for all? Arnel also stresses the link between mental health status and housing. The SDGs place emphasis on security (yes, at the level of what is happening in Ukraine, Gaza, South Sudan...), then housing follows. And with climate refugees to follow ...! I have seen gentrification, and listened to an account in 2007 as Manchester started to experience high-rise growth. I used to try to walk to community visits with students when possible. Observational skills come in many forms, safety still depends upon them. With no place to call home, safety and security is a stark issue for people. A foundation for health, wellbeing and ironically productivity. The rise of foodbanks is also damning. 

Gambling is not indexed, but there appears a denial in the UK government, with other nations 'folding' to the influence of lobbying and corporate influence reducing or removing restrictions in gambling and crucially: advertising. What's the denial you say? Yes, well governments seem to be in denial that there are vulnerable groups in their respective populations. It is laudable that they bestow upon the citizenry the freedom of choice, but that can spell trouble.

If Canada - Ontario has its housing scandal:
'Housing insecurity and homelessness occur because the state and its goencies support real estate and banking corporations that continuously increase housing prices. This setup is a huge problem because these enti- ties focus on generating profit and capital accumulation. The Greenbelt Scandal in Ontario revealed how the government made decisions that served the interests of big companies instead of the public (McGrath 2023; Office of the Auditor General of Ontario 2023). This scandal is an example of neoliberalism and a corrupt style of governance (Moscrop 2023). We need to stop using neoliberal strategies and focus on socialized housing.' p.27.

So does the UK: Grenfell Tower Inquiry No doubt, other nations have their tragic examples. It seems 'international Standards', quality, integrity can never be taken for quality. They too are precarious, vulnerable. Borras's work in chapter 2 on housing security, and differenciation of core housing need is laudable, informative and welcome. Re-reading Arnel's point: 'There is no doubt that housing insecurity affects health'. p.28. His book as a whole makes the point that of course more evidence will always be needed. In healthcare for decades the basics of public health have been identified, studied, established, placed in models and frameworks. Yet we find we are found wanting (UK - Awaab's Law) dragged back to the first steps; and despite the urgent issues we now face.

"Universal health care" is not exactly new:

The Canadian Association of Social Workers. (1961). The Social Worker, Volume 29, Numbers 1 to 2. 29(1to2), 1to78. The Canadian Association of Social Workers. The Social Worker - Le travailleur social. Canadian Association of Social Workers. https://jstor.org/stable/community.39672572.

Borras is correct to write of 'The Continuing Private War against Universal Health Care' (p.36). Looking at NGRAM it appears the private sector has been winning in recent decades. Working previously as a community mental health nurse for older adults, chapter 3 explores Canada's health care systems. Table 3.1 compares the ownership of long-term care homes in figures. The discussion deals with the quality of care and variation. Policy intentions, plans, research and what follows in practice is also debated. Is there any comfort  in learning that Canada is not alone in being skilled at kicking-can-down-the-road. To be fair many developed nations face the same demographic cliff (whichever way you it!), just one of the urgent issues noted above. The contribution of informal carers is also highlighted.

Here in the UK the commissioner - provider split and models of care at the finance level are a maze: amazing in their bureaucracy. Borras does a marvellous job, in providing enough detail without weighing the narrative flow, and losing the reader. The close of chapter 3 offers hope that Hodges' model will continue to be found:
'Therefore, shifting away from neoliberalism toward a new societal system where health care is seen as a fundamental human need and a universal right, not a profit-driven commodity, is crucial. This alternative system requires a new societal framework built on solidarity, fairness, and humanity, prioritizing health over financial and personal gain.' p.50.
See also: Post i : Post ii : Post iv : Post v (to follow)

Arnel M. Borras. (2025) Health and Health Care Inequities - A Critical Political Economy Perspective. Fernwood Publishing.

In addition:

Messing, K., & de Grosbois, S. (2001). Women Workers Confront One-Eyed Science: Building Alliances to Improve Women’s Occupational Health. Women & Health, 33(1–2), 125–141. https://doi.org/10.1300/J013v33n01_08  (Borras - pp.11-12).

https://nhsrho.org/news/tender-maternal-and-neonatal-image-library/

Monday, July 28, 2025

Book: ii 'Health and Health Care Inequities'


In the introduction to Health and Health Care Inequities - A Critical Political Economy Perspective, Borras concludes:
'This book aims to spark thoughutful conversation and collaboration by moving away from capitalism to improve society and health. Health is not just about nursing and medicine; it is integrally connected to economic, political, cultural, and institutional systems. Moreover, it encompasses philosophy and ethics. Capitalism's focus on individualism and competition harms people and the environment,making it all but impossible to achieve health equity. We must work together to envision and create a new world that ensures fairer and better health for all.' p.3.
This sets the tone for a short 163 page book, with a page of acknowledgements, (said) introduction pp.1-3, reference listing pp.136-153; 10 page index, and eight chapters:

Chapter 1: Social Determinants of Health Inequities
Chapter 2: Neoliberalism and Canada’s Housing Policies
Chapter 3: Neoliberalism and Canada’s Health Care System
Chapter 4: Political Power and Policy Advocacy
Chapter 5: The Role of Evidence and Ideas
Chapter 6: A Critical Political Economy Approach
Chapter 7: Searching for Socialism
Chapter 8: Mobilizing for Health Equity
Chapter 1 on 'Social Determinants' provides the first of many political points to underscore the effort with Hodges' model here. If income and poverty come second the preceding paragraphs on wages reveal the socialist stance stand of the author, and the acknowledged networks. Throughout the book the relational nature of determinants, inequality, inequity, protected characteristics, socio-economics and political struggle is raised. In the discussion on wages the importance of education is described in cross-cultural and gender-based terms. The book possibly turns on the sentence:
'To effectively address poverty, we need to unite those who are in poverty with individuals who have more economic stability but are still ulnerable within our capitalist system. These individuals are at risk of falling into poverty if they lose their jobs due to workplace closures or privatization. It is essential to acknowledge that certain groups experience higher poverty rates, but we should see them not as victims but as protagonists and capable workers facing unique but connected challenges.' p.7.
For the people who follow the news, the majority of 'us' are (even if only roughly) aware of the distribution of wealth across national and the global population: the injustice. The erosion and lack of union representation within many workforces, especially 'Big-tech'. The way utility enterprises have provided dividends for shareholders at the expense of ongoing investment in infrastructure, the quality of service provided to the public and even public safety. COVID (p.7), crystalised 'difference' for us all. I came to now substitute collective for 'group' in Hodges' model. Suddenly all those individuals, many working in health, were collectively vulnerable:

Individual
|
      INTERPERSONAL    :     SCIENCES               
HUMANISTIC  --------------------------------------  MECHANISTIC      
 SOCIOLOGY  :    POLITICAL 
|
Group
PSYCHOLOGICALLY
EXISTENTIALLY
BELIEFS
SCIENCE
PHYSICALLY
data, information, knowledge
SOCIALLY
CULTURALLY
SOCIAL MEDIA
wisdom, leadership, truth
LAW - POLICY
FREEDOM - CHOICE

Throughout the text, I like the concise coherence Borras demonstrates in the steps from wages, income and poverty to investigate the state of health inequities. Once again (from i) the context is Canada, but the lessons are for all - as globalisation should/must demand?  There is public health history too. As expected Canada's First Nation, Indigenous, and Nunavut populations are frequently referenced regards exclusion and disparity in health services access and provision. Under health inequities, after infant mortality and life expectancy there is a convention(?) adopted of several axes being identified. The first (p.9) is the class-health axis, then class-gender-health and others. No surprise I found the relational and organisational aspects of these 'constructs' very helpful. As I try to think of Hodges' model as a mathematical object I realise (through oft impromtu conversations^) that we don't have two 'axes' in Hodges' model. Still musing on this; and more to follow ...

Arnel M. Borras. (2025) Health and Health Care Inequities - A Critical Political Economy Perspective. Fernwood Publishing.

^A pure maths lecturer, Gower St Waterstones, London.

See also: Post i : Post iii : Post iv : Post v (to follow)

Wednesday, July 23, 2025

Book: 'Health and Health Care Inequities' i

I didn't attend online the book launch for Health and Health Care Inequities. It appeared to be in the early hours for the UK. Making good progress on a week's break last month, upon return, a presentation and some writing proved a distraction. I've picked it up again, a task that was smooth and straightforward such is the style and writing. H&HCI is - as expected - academic. The statistics, politics and government publications come thick and fast. But they literally do count here.

Borras and the Fernwood are based in Canada. The focus of Borras's thesis is then Canadian politics, economics, society, social and cultural challenges, poverty, exclusion, global standing, statistics and reporting (and more) are all relevant globally. Especially as COVID, climate change, and the current state (or stasis?) of global health provision attests. The book is unashamably Marxist, but not heavy with it. If that makes sense. I was drawn to the publisher too. Well: critical books for critical thinkers; how could I resist!
The influence of Marx and Marxism on the 20th century is profound and full of contradictions. There's the history, and its lessons of Marxism as a political ideology and the geopolitical exemplars that have given Marxism a 'bad' name. To the extent that 'socialism' is also tainted. What other term can be applied that captures 'Marxism', Marxist thought and its relevance today? And that is, relevance in terms of health, health care and social care inequities? 'Struggle' seems utterly inadequate amid current news?

Amidst the history of various revolutions, some arguably on-going, fizzled out, on life support ...? it is, it seems, capitalism that goes marching on. To keep time, the metronome is the tick of central processing unit, and now the graphics 'pu' and tensor; for we live in the 'information age'. I've been keeping notes, but will begin with some reading today, which is an excellent point to 'healthcare professionals', obsessed as we are, with evidence.
'I often go back to Carol Weiss. Years ago, she said three things that go into the decision making ... information, ideology, and interest. And then she went on to say, don't for one moment think that information can trump either ideology or interest. So if you look at the whole climate debate right now, it's actually an ideological debate, The right-wing, the Republicans, some Conservatives here, their rejection of the evidence has nothing to do with the evidence. It's really an ideology ... our group thinks this way, and we are aligned with the fossil fuel industry because they're rich and powerful. Our whole system is based on cheap energy. And so we have to keep going kind of thing. And bugger the evidence.

And that second one, which is actually very closely related to that, is interest. By interest, she meant power and wealth and stakeholders. So, who gets the policy they want? The people who have the money and power to influence it. So, the fossil fuel industry is very powerful ... And so, no matter what the evidence is, they have a financial interest in not having any controls upon them having the minimum of controls. And so, that will triumph usually. So, you put together ideology and interest, and it will almost always overcome evidence or information.' p.78.
More to follow and a return here is essential.

Weiss, C.H. (1983). Ideology, Interests, and Information. In: Callahan, D., Jennings, B. (eds) Ethics, The Social Sciences, and Policy Analysis. The Hastings Center Series in Ethics. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-7015-4_9

Arnel M. Borras. (2025) Health and Health Care Inequities - A Critical Political Economy Perspective. Fernwood Publishing.

See also: Post ii : Post iii : Post iv : Post v (to follow)

Tuesday, July 15, 2025

Essay: 'Addressing health inequalities through employment' July 2025


Four priorities:
  1. Establish closer working relationships across the SA [Strategic Authorities] ecosystem to prioritise action on health inequalities.  

  2. Align resources to support people on their journey to sustainable employment.

  3. Negotiate with government for greater permissions.

  4. Harness the power of anchors.
 

Many useful references are also provided, e.g. Building Blocks of Health. Plus the discussion of anchors.



Individual
|
      INTERPERSONAL    :     SCIENCES               
HUMANISTIC  --------------------------------------  MECHANISTIC      
 SOCIOLOGY  :    POLITICAL 
|
Group
employment as a determinant of health

mental & emotional health

Early intervention, employer-employee liaison, health coaching*


PLACE - PLANET

physical health - life-expectancy

LOCAL - accessible
SOCIO-

people & communities

flourishing communities

neighbourhood

People in communities on 
LONG-TERM SICKNESS

WORKWELL grants*

WIDER DETERMINANTS OF HEALTH

SOCIAL VALUE OF HEALTH

low-quality jobs - poorer health

Poverty - HOUSING SECURITY


-ECONOMIC

NHS 10 Year plan: 1. GP / dental access
2.  waiting lists hospital and community care
3. staff demoralised and demotivated
4. outcomes on major killers like cancer lag behind other countries.

STRAGEIC AUTHORITIES - DEVOLUTION
shift of wealth & power

HEALTH INEQUALITIES
inequity

WHOLE GOVERNMENT
APPROACH TO HEALTH

ECONOMIC VALUE OF HEALTH

low-quality jobs

Local strategic response


See also -

Opinion: Failing to collect, analyse, and report ethnicity data in clinical research leads to healthcare inequalities. BMJ 2025; 390 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.r1457 (Published 14 July 2025)
Cite this as: BMJ 2025;390:r1457

 'hospital' : 'community' : 'analogue' : 'digital' : 'prevention' : 'sickness'

My source: https://x.com/TheKingsFund/status/1944678280461734226

Sunday, May 04, 2025

NHS & Politics: You don't have to do 'The Hokey Cokey'

c/o Lunch with the FT - Amanda Pritchard
Life&Arts :: FTWeekend


individual
|
INTERPERSONAL : SCIENCES
humanistic ------------------------------- mechanistic
SOCIOLOGY : POLITICAL
|
group
'Another question that she says will become increasingly pressing is what "the core business" of the health service should be at a time when parts of the state and voluntary sectors have been squeezed, leaving the NHS to pick up the slack. GPs tell her that between one in four and one in five of their patients come to them for help with non-health problems.

A colleague in a mental health service recently told her it employs a housing team to support patients who couldn't otherwise be discharged from hospital. "You wouldn't say the core business of the health service is as a housing provider, but that's where we've ended up."'

She adds: "Think about how long it takes to train a doctor - you can't change your mind every five minutes. . . Think about what it requires to put new [digital] systems in place. It's not buying the tech - that's the easy bit. It's the implementation . . . and some consistency of leadership is really helpful."

'The NHS contributes between 10 and 
20 per cent to people's health, she says - a figure I find startlingly low. "The rest is what we would recognise as the wider [social] determinants, including housing, and meaningful employment, but also smoking, diet, alcohol and lack of exercise. "I know there's an anxiety sometimes about being too nanny stateish about this . . But it is going to take really bold action to set the conditions for people to then live healthier lives."'


'The abolition of NHS England marks the end of an attempt to take the politics out of the health service by placing its day-to-day running in the hands of an arm's-length body. But Pritchard suggests that if this was the intent, it was probably never realistic. "It's too important to the country [and] we spend too much public money for ... the politics not to be part of it."'



My source:
Sarah Neville, Lunch with the FT Amanda Pritchard, Life&Arts, FTWeekend, 26-27 April, 2025, p.3.

Previously: 'Nye' : 'SOCIO-technical' : 'housing'

Saturday, March 01, 2025

Paper: Human social genomics i

Abstract

'The exciting field of human social genomics provides an evolutionarily informed, multilevel framework for understanding how positive and negative social–environmental experiences affect the genome to impact lifelong health, well-being, behavior, and longevity. In this review, we first summarize common patterns of socially influenced changes in the expression of pro-inflammatory and antiviral immune response genes (e.g., the Conserved Transcriptional Response to Adversity), and the multilevel psychological, neural, and cell signaling pathways by which social factors regulate human gene expression. Second, we examine how these effects are moderated by genetic polymorphisms and the specific types of social–environmental experiences that most strongly affect gene expression and health. Third, we identify positive psychosocial experiences and interventions that have been found to impact gene expression. Finally, we discuss promising opportunities for future research on this topic and how health care providers can use this information to improve patient health and well-being.'

Slavich GM, Mengelkoch S, Cole SW. Human social genomics: Concepts, mechanisms, and implications for health. Lifestyle Med. 2023; 4:e75. https://doi.org/10.1002/lim2.75
 

Lifestyle Medicine
For ongoing study of Hodges' model this is an interesting paper, especially in seeking to bridge the humanistic and mechanistic axis, and the social (soft) sciences and (hard) sciences. In trying to view Hodges' model as a mathematical object (categories, objects, relations ..) and extend the bio-psycho-social model (as needed urgently) of medicine (health and social care) the focus of this paper can help us explore the determinants.

It may be possible using Hodges' model, to identity (isolate) some specific ways in which conceptual models are idealised. They can reveal the nature and extent of situations - compositions, formulations and relationships (scope of practice?), but in practice of course we cannot set a situation* in aspic.


This may be important (essential) when we consider the determinants of health globally (across all the domains of Hodges' model).


Individual
|
      INTERPERSONAL    :     SCIENCES               
HUMANISTIC  --------------------------------------  MECHANISTIC      
 SOCIOLOGY  :    POLITICAL 
|
Group



Genomics

Social Genomics




*Hodges' model is situated.

To revisit ..

Sunday, December 01, 2024

ii Comparison and Contrasting the Meikirch Model and Hodges' model

Meikirch Model

Quite some time has passed since June 1st and part 1. I don't think this post can wait 18 years like that preceding! It is good to see '(Biologically given) potential' emphasized in the Meikirch Model; and the arrows which refer to:


'Whenever the five components and the ten complex interactions (double arrows) cooperate in a purposeful way, health may result. More specifically, a person is healthy, if by the two potentials she or he is in a position to respond satisfactorily to the demands of life.'


The interactions are explained in more detail. Mental health (illness) is there in 'personally acquired potential', but I wonder if it needs to be more explicit? Although, is this a welcome 'break' from the mind-BODY Cartesian divide and its legacy? A shift that enables a more constructive (less stigmatizing) formulation?

Given the climate crisis and experience of COVID, we can hopefully retain a sense of our individual proximity to the environment and green spaces. The importance of access to 'green spaces' seems to be sustained, even if action on air quality (and plastics in the environment) is still playing catch up with WHO air quality recommendations. The interdependence of nations and geography crystallizes more each month. The need for international cooperation apparent in cities, such as Lahore (1). Pollution and smog in Pakistan depends on what happens in India. Water flows, the how, when and whether is noted as a potential trigger for future conflicts.

Both models, the Meikirch, and Hodges' are of course idealizations. As such there are inevitable limitations, assumptions, pros and cons. Like many concepts, environment is a compound or expansive term. Simultaneously, from a primary meaning, we can proceed from the physical environment, to the social, political and the mental environment that these invoke or foster. 

In the SCIENCES domain of Hodges' model we are in 'a' - the environment. Physical reality presents itself in raw and fundamental terms. Across the world climate change is threatening many homes and places a stress the importance of 'shelter' and the homeless. Natural disasters, and acute local weather events which are now repetitive disrupt life and population. Conflicts continue to displace people, climate refugees will follow: (https://www.unhcr.org/refugee-statistics). Contrast this with the ideals of housing design that is sustainable and also enables occupants and communities to feel the environment. 

'Ecosystem' is being applied in ways beyond its original articulation. This past N. summer-autumn reading and reviewing -

Capra and Luisi's (2014) The Systems View of Life - A Unifying Vision.
(i) https://hodges-model.blogspot.com/2024/09/i-systems-view-life.html

- there was much emphasis on complexity, ecosystems, emergence, education, and obviously systems.

In their model, Bircher and Hahn incorporate Complex Adaptive Systems (CAS).
https://meikirch-modell.ch/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/Health-and-diease-as-CAS.pdf

This is helpful as the ecosystem is transformed, before our eyes. Clearly, there isn't one ecosystem, but several and they are all dynami: even if, outdoor clothing and car manufacturers want us to believe that we can create our own private ecosystem that is trans-portable. Systems are like the whirls in moving water, they come and go. Ironically there are now more opportunities to study them - if we so choose. Now weather events reveal the risks of people trying to sustain these mindsets when a local catastrophe strikes. The website for the Meikirch Model includes the table below. 

Theories Concerning
Health and Disease
Type of thinking Epistemology Means for comprehension
Prescientific Personal experience Intuition
Scientific: Meikirch-Model
Scientific argumentation Rational mind

This is constructive as models should encompass what can be presented as 'knowledge' and from there: data, information, facts, myth, wisdom and folk theory. Intuition is listed as a prescientific 'means for comprehension'. Intuition is highly subjective, in contrast to the (supposed) objectivity of the sciences. Intuition is nonetheless significant in mental health care - psychotherapy, and in truth more generally (interpersonal skills); even if it remains 'unscientific' and an enigmatic phenomena. 

On twi/X and here on W2tQ, I've suggested that the bio-medical, and the biopsychosocial models are inadequate as conceptualisations for healthcare and education. We need to fully encompass the subjective and humanistic dimensions of health care and lived experience, giving more attention, if not credence to 'personal experience'. In England and Wales these past months and to follow our parliament has been debating assisted dying for people with terminal illness. Both sides acknowledge the sorry state of palliative care. Policy and ethics - hence the politics of health needs to be explicit in a model of/for healthcare.

Working in mental health you quickly understand how critical it is being able to relate to others, and  develop therapeutic relationships. Get this wrong, and problems may follow. If interpersonal - communication are essential to a health professional's knowledge then awareness and competence in relational skills are also key. In the past two years or so, I've realised the importance of this for Hodges' model and trying to develop a theory to underpin Hodges' model. I believe that this is a strength of Hodges' model. So we need to extend the table above. 

Individual
   |
      INTERPERSONAL    :     SCIENCES               
HUMANISTIC  --------------------------------------  MECHANISTIC      
 SOCIOLOGY  :   POLITICAL 
|
Group

choice - life style

reasoning - rationality

my literacy - responsibility

mental illness - fear of stigma

intuition / subjectivity


geography - environment

air pollution - smog & plastics

traffic regulation - metrics

Planetary health

'truth' objectivity

community - relationships

culture

social systems

family

social (all) determinants

international cooperation

transparency / accountability

policies - funding

determinants of health

reporting - citizen science


As part 1 started, I will finish with the title of the paper that prompted these reflections:

Bircher J. und Hahn E. G., (2017). Will the Meikirch Model, a New Framework for Health, Induce a Paradigm Shift in Healthcare? Cureus 9(3): e1081. DOI 10.7759/cureus.1081 

The Meikrich model is not alone in seeking to facilitate and deliver a paradigm shift in healthcare; and, at individual, collective, planetary levels, across social care and education and the disciplines - old and new.
 
(1) https://www.independent.co.uk/climate-change/news/pakistan-lahore-air-pollution-schools-shut-aqi-b2640783.html