Hodges' Model: Welcome to the QUAD: contracts

Hodges' model is a conceptual framework to support reflection and critical thinking. Situated, the model can help integrate all disciplines (academic and professional). Amid news items, are posts that illustrate the scope and application of the model. A bibliography and A4 template are provided in the sidebar. Welcome to the QUAD ...

Showing posts with label contracts. Show all posts
Showing posts with label contracts. Show all posts

Tuesday, February 10, 2026

'Why is it so hard to find an NHS dentist?' BBC Radio 4 - Inside Health


'Dentistry is high on the public and political agenda. There have been dozens of headlines about access to NHS dentistry, with some people having to travel huge distances to find a dentist, or being put onto long waiting lists to get an NHS appointment.

In this episode of Inside Health, James Gallagher is joined by chairman of the British Dental Association Eddie Crouch, the Oral Health Foundation's Dr Rachael England, and consultant oral surgeon Tom Thayer. Together, they drill into the issues surrounding NHS dentistry. Along the way, they discuss possible solutions, whether contract reforms will help, and the potential future of dentistry in the UK.

Presenter: James Gallagher
Producers: Alice Lipscombe-Southwell and Thomas Hunt
Production coordinator: Stuart Laws
Content editor: Ilan Goodman'

Source & image: https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/m002r3nn

Latest paper re. Hodges' model:

S. Bettiol, P. Jones, H. A. Onyedikachi, and W. G. Kernohan, (2026) Bridging Gaps in Oral Health Frameworks: Mapping With Hodges' Health Career - Care Domains - Model, Journal of Public Health Dentistry. 1–14, https://doi.org/10.1111/jphd.70034

Wednesday, March 27, 2019

Nursing's Golden Ratio: Safe-Staffing:Law

individual
|
INTERPERSONAL : SCIENCES
humanistic ----------------------------------------------- mechanistic
SOCIOLOGY : POLITICAL
|
group - POPULATION

Care Philosophy:
Task orientation Vs Person-centred
(Reality: Hybrid that assures person-centredness?)

Individual Patient's, Friend's and Family impression

Individual Patient's, Friend's and Family experience (AND memory)

Confidence in Care
(Confidence as a Learning Environment)
 Individual Nurse's Values
Individual Patient Outcomes
PURPOSES 

Numbers - count
"40,000 missing Nursing" [RCN]
Ratios: x :: y
Staffing Research (Falls, Quality...)
Operational Research; Measures
Dependency; Chronicity; Nursing hours / day; Skill-mix; Care undone
Productive Nursing Care
Demographics: Local, National, Int.
TIME:
tasks, events, priorities, shifts
The E's: Efficiency, Effectiveness, Equity, Equality

 PROCESS
Qualitative



Duty of Care
Public awareness / sensibilities
History of Research into Staffing
(Time and Motion studies)

Direct Nursing Care
High Quality Nursing Care = The Golden Ratio

PRACTICE
Quantitative

Recruitment, Retention, Attrition
Workforce Planning
Professional Accountability
Commensurate: Policy - Law
NMC Code of Conduct
Contract of Employment
Employment T&C
Emigration Policy, Overseas Workers
Professional Bodies inc RCN, Unions ...
Nurse Administration Support
Information System - Synergy?
 POLICY



My prompt with thanks: https://twitter.com/DannGooding/status/1110929934262898689


Additional sources [ c/o @DannGooding ]

A critical moment: NHS staffing trends, retention and attrition
Health Foundation, ISBN: 978-1-911615-25-5

RCN

American Nurses Association, Nurse Staffing Literature Review

Wednesday, July 05, 2017

ERCIM News No. 110 Special theme "Blockchain Engineering"

Dear ERCIM News Reader,

ERCIM News 110
ERCIM News No. 110 has just been published at https://ercim-news.ercim.eu/

In this issue: 

- Special Theme "Blockchain Engineering" coordinated by the guest editors Elli Andoulaki (IBM Research – Zurich), Matthias Jarke (RWTH Aachen University & Fraunhofer FIT) and Jean-Jacques Quisquater (Université catholique de Louvain, Belgium, and research affiliate at MIT).


  • Call for Proposals - Dagstuhl Seminars and Perspectives Workshops
  • European Computer Science Summit 2017, Lisbon, 23-25 October


A public sector section includes - "How Distributed Ledgers Can Transform Healthcare Applications".

This issue is also available for download in 
pdf and ePUB

Thank you for your interest in ERCIM News. Feel free to forward this message to others who might be interested.

Next issues: 
No. 111, October  2017 - Special Theme: "Digital Humanities"
No. 112, January 2018 - Special Theme: "Quantum Computing"

Best regards,
Peter Kunz
ERCIM News editor in chief

Friday, July 31, 2015

Workshop & CfP: The post-Fordist Care Regime

A workshop series organised by the Centre for Philosophy and Political Economy (CPPE), School of Management, University of Leicester, UK
Workshop 1: The Business of Care

Keynote Speaker: Silke Roth (Southampton)

Convened by Vanessa Beck, Steve Brown and Fabian Frenzel

CPPE, School of Management, University of Leicester, UK

Date: 10th December 2015

Certain transformations in our political economic landscape can be distilled according to regimes of care. Fordist care was provided primarily by female ‘free labour’ within the family context, while the state played a large role through institutions like schools, pensions, prisons and hospitals. By contrast the private sector role was rather limited although, of course regimes are uneven and varied across different countries and social sectors. The post-Fordist regime of care was triggered, in part, by a rebellion against the invisible and unvalued nature of female ‘free labour’ in the care domain, for example in housework or child care. Demands for more autonomous, neither market nor state based forms of care were made and realised in new social and urban movements that pursued attempts to create new forms of social reproduction and care in communes, housing co-ops or self organised childcare. Despite the progressive impetus of many of these initiatives, it is possible to see, with hindsight, how demands for autonomous care were subsumed within the general move away from state provision and towards privatisation as well as individualisation of care responsibility. In the post-Fordist regime the provision of care is increasingly organised around the needs of capitalist valorisation. This drive towards privatisation is ostensibly about efficiency and budgetary restraint, the underlying motives, however, may well be more diffuse, pointing to the opening of new sources of surplus value capture for a growing sector of market oriented care provision.

Yet as the State outsources care jobs (in prisons, health, schools, etc), the organisation of markets has taken on specific characteristics. This includes the internationalisation of the care regime with transnational businesses of care, a transnational labour force and the expanding mobilities of care receivers. A further aspect is the increasing financialisation of care, which includes the creation of ever-new financial vehicles, from Private-Public Partnerships to social impact bonds that aim at ensuring efficiency in the care sector but often do the exact opposite. Both nationally and internationally we witness the renewed mobilisation of ‘free labour’. Unlike in the Fordist regime of care, this now aims at volunteers across age and gender groups and framings such as the ‘big society’ and 'international volunteering'. Beside this unremunerated work we see increasingly precarious conditions of labour in the care sector, often migrant labour, on zero hour contracts and minimum wages. The precise composition of this labour market is another area of interest. What novel forms of organisation are emerging in response to our present regime of care? And what resistance is emerging?

Finally, although price is often taken to be the primary concern of post-Fordist care provision, the quality of care cannot be ignored, though it is difficult to measure. Beyond a private industry of care provision we also find a new ‘industry of measurement’ that claims to assess the value and quality of privately administered care. The organisation of these new organisational patterns and industries of care are the subject of this workshop.

We invite papers that interrogate the shift to a post-Fordist care regime. We are interested in a variety of scales, from local to global in which this shift becomes visible and invite contributions from across care sectors broadly defined, from health (including mental health) to housework, from medicine to (social) housing, from education to welfare. We are interested in analyses of businesses of care, including care evaluation and financialisation, in investigations of the labour of care, national and international, waged, ‘free’ and precarious and the struggles of this labour. Finally we are also interested in receivers of care and their responses to the post-Fordist care regime.

Organisation:
The broad scope of the call is intended to allow for a comprehensive investigation of the post-Fordist care regime. Some of the threads of this workshop will be picked up in two following workshops that chart ‘Alternatives of Care’ and the ‘Cosmologies of Care’, to be announced separately in due course.

Please submit abstracts of up to 750 words to describe your paper. Invited papers will be presented in Pecha Kucha style. Presentations consist of 20 slides that have to be presented in 20 seconds each. (Follow this link to find more information on Pecha Kucha). The organisation of the day aims to encourage shared discussion and the format of Pecha Kucha allows for succinct presentations. Papers will be commented on by our invited keynote Silke Roth as well as the three workshop convenors. We also invite all speakers to submit outline papers (of about 2000 words) to be shared among participants prior of the workshop.

Dates:Please submit abstracts to ff48 AT le.ac.uk by the 30th September 2015. We will respond by mid October 2015. Presenters should submit an outline paper (of max. 2000 words) by the 1st December 2015 to circulate among participants of the workshop.

We also plan to facilitate a publication of full papers from the event.

The workshop is free of charge, and refreshments and lunch will be provided during the day. A limited number of travel bursaries is available. They will be targeted at presenting PhD students and researchers without access to institutional funding in the first instance. Please indicate if you would like to be considered for a travel bursary as you submit your abstract.

---------------------
Dr Fabian Frenzel
Lecturer in Organisation
PRME Officer
School of Management
University of Leicester
LE1 7RH
UK

My source:
Dr Vanessa Beck via ESA-ALL AT JISCMAIL.AC.UK (some extra text also emboldened as relate to Hodges' model).

Wednesday, March 25, 2015

A cheap post... the cost of Zero?

Sometimes things become blurred
- unresolved -
things do not touch as they should,
lines of communication and care
are compromised; things fragmented...

individual
INTERPERSONAL : SCIENCES
humanistic ------------------------------------------- mechanistic
SOCIOLOGY : POLITICAL
group
WHERE DO VALUES RESIDE?

I-deals

Vs.

We-deals
5 minutes travel time client to client
WHOLE-ISTIC
SOCIAL CARE


HR
Zero Hour Contracts


BBC Radio 4 Today: Care workers not paid for travel between patients, 24 March 2015.


Image sources:
5 minutes -
http://www.explaininja.com/

Zero as coins: original image -
http://www.spiritresourcing.com/blog/training-providers/fe-sector-zero-hour-contracts-will-the-o-have-to-go/

Friday, January 09, 2015

the GE METRY of CARE and C NTRACTS

individual
INTERPERSONAL : SCIENCES
humanistic ------------------------------------------- mechanistic
SOCIOLOGY : POLITICAL
group














Image source:
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/a/a0/Circle_-_black_simple.svg/500px-Circle_-_black_simple.svg.png

#entanglement

Wednesday, December 21, 2011

Social Impact Bonds (SIBs) in Health

The following text is from the report:

Social Impact Bonds
A new way to invest in better healthcare


PURPOSE

This report is about the potential applicability of Social Impact Bonds (SIBs) in the health field. The SIB is a financial mechanism where investor returns are aligned with social outcomes. The SIB is based on a
contract with government in which the government commits to pay for an improvement in social outcomes for a defined population. Investors fund a range of preventative interventions with the goal of improving the contracted outcomes. If and as the outcomes improve, investors receive payments from government.

To widespread interest, the first SIB was launched in September 2010. Its aim is to reduce reoffending among short sentence male prisoners leaving Peterborough prison.

Social Finance believes that the reach of the Social Impact Bond model is wider than Criminal Justice. We asked Professor Paul Corrigan, a leading health adviser, to assess the suitability of the SIB model for
the NHS. This report presents his thoughts. We hope that his report provokes a thoughtful debate on how, or alternatively if, financial mechanisms such as Social Impact Bonds, might fund new interventions, improve people’s well-being and ultimately lead to a real change in the health system.

https://yoursri.com/users/570478ce8443743bff8b7e51c4d7ba60/b8984d6a364dadf0ff6c5d869f8f0cb8/@@download/fs


My original source: HSJ

Monday, April 28, 2008

Hodges' model and care domain dependencies

Analysis and Synthesis: pretty powerful tools.

Looking at Hodges' model the other day I've thought of the model as a foundation upon which learners and experts alike can build. Looking at the model afresh I've realised that (whatever we all may or may not believe) outside of the model there is the 5th spiritual domain. After this and for some people because of this 5th domain time, energy, matter and love came into being.

So now to Hodges' model itself: we could not have health, social AND pastoral care systems if it were not for the SOCIAL and POLITICAL domains. These two group domains underpin and support the individual domains. There has always been talk of the golden age. These two domains provide the scaffolding for our lives and we would do well to remember this in these burnt umber times.


Reading Michel Serres and other authors you realise that the SCIENCE and intra-INTERPERSONAL care domains depend on the continued support and sustenance of the SOCIAL contract and the POLITICAL contract. I have not written 'social AND political contracts' purposefully as this suggests far greater similarity than I can argue for.

As we look and consider the relationships at work, what else can you see?

Well, we can see the distance between our collective understanding of science AND the distance between many individuals and the political process. Depicted in this way the fragility of things so often taken for granted - research, health care, individual choice, technologically enhanced and aspirational life styles becomes starkly apparent. The things that are granted do rely on contracts. Now though these two contracts themselves depend on the formulation and enactment of a natural contract between the Earth and its inhabitants (Serres, 1990).

Serres, M. The Natural Contract, trans. Elizabeth MacArthur and William Paulson, University of Michigan Press; 1995.