Reading the website of the project (posted yesterday) I noticed that their founding ideas can be mapped to Hodges' model. As depicted below some are pretty obvious, notably the POLITICAL domain and the SOCIOLOGICAL.
Their first founding idea is placed in the interpersonal domain. This is very subjective exercise - literally playing with words - but here I am prioritizing individual cognitive access above physical access. I am thinking of individual participants. As Nanotechnologies for Development state the first idea also focuses on countries - the group. So maybe I am wrong, if there is a wrong when using models - idealisations - in this way?
Staying with the group, access and participation are also a crucial matter of human rights - education, health information, health and social care, employment, freedoms, and security - freedom from violence, unlawful imprisonment...
These founding ideas clearly denote underpinning values, note in-particular the way risks and benefits are included at the individual and the group level.
In the SCIENCES domain from the beginning acknowledges time, process, project management. Nanotechnology needs to be understood in terms of the environments we inhabit. Not just us, now; but grandchildren... too. Not just the physical environment, but that embodied under and within this other divide: skin.
Within the mechanistic domains how will consultation about benefits and risks be negotiated and communicated to the humanistic domains?
How will the individual - group : community - commercial enterprise and innovation be squared?
This individual-group distinction is becoming ever more significant - of which more to follow.
INTERPERSONAL : SCIENCES
|The first founding idea of this project is that developing countries should not be denied participation in advanced modern technologies.||The third core idea is that such developments entail risks and benefits that need to be addressed from the beginning.|
|The second that they should do that in their own culturally-specific ways. Our approach rejects any a priori distinction between traditional and modern technologies, but rather seeks innovative ways to connect indigenous and globalized knowledge and practices.|
The fourth founding idea is that choices about those benefits and risks need to be made in a democratic way.
Source: Technologies for Development: Project Founding ideas