Review: iii Fundamentals of Person-Centred Healthcare Practice
Previously, I recognised the many links throughout the book and on p.54 there are five relating to professional standards. These reflect the book's international scope and multidisciplinary relevance. Those on page 54 do work and support the text. One of them I was presented not with the expected page and missed the outcome of the 'click'. I wasn't going to re-type but found the page through the site's menu. Some links are long, as I found, whether permalinks [usually shorter] or fallback search text might improve link-longevity I'm not sure.
As a reassurance the contrast issue black-text-on-dark-green is limited to one figure.
The book is well referenced with an additional reading list. I've been made aware through plagiarism detectors (one paper) which - it appears - have 'read' an introductory section to Hodges' model as self-plagiarism. I wondered if in comprising a community of practice the references here maybe somewhat insular. I've no analysis to support this and the same no doubt may apply to other to emergent ideas, including threshold concepts. You have to start somewhere. At fear of contradiction there are many theories called upon and referenced.
Students may find the more attention to the position and specificity of references useful p.75 "we cannot not communicate." How times, chapters (8 - Communicating and Relating Effectively), theory, practice and management are challenged. The art of 'sympathetic presencing' working on the phone triaging acute community mental health referrals, 'Being kind and warm'.
For a text on person-centredness the book is imho mental illness-health light, but then as noted what is the book about? Am I suggesting that such books should attend to disciplinary equality? That said if there is a test for parity of esteem here, what do you conclude from one dedicated chapter? I was surprised, but is there a dilemma here? Beside 'Trust in self and others' I made a note, 'intuition'. Is person-centredness and being person-centred taken for granted within mental health practice? Research suggests not.
Reading the table of contents you will find:
Chapter 18: Being person-centred in the acute hospital settingChapter 19: Person-Centred Rehabilitation
Chapter 20: Being person-centred in community and ambulatory services
Chapter 21: Experiencing person-centredness in long-term care
Chapter 22: Being person-centred in mental health services
Chapter 23: Person-centred support for people with learning disabilities
Chapter 24: Being Person-centred in Maternity Services
Chapter 25: Being person-centred in children’s services
Chapter 26: Being person-centred when working with people living with long-term conditions
Chapter 27: Palliative and end of life care services
I had a sense that the chapters were not sufficiently differentiated despite the titles. This may say more about my reading and the (editor's achieved) coherence of the book overall. Perhaps also for me, person-centredness is realised in-situ with personalised details. Not just vignettes (which are used) but the detailed intra- interpersonal, social, physical, political and spiritual choreography that is person-centred care: whether or not there is engagement (a dance).
Dementia is represented but the context appears to be residential care. You will find challenging / courageous conversations, but not challenging behaviour in situations that test interpersonal skills and person-centredness especially for staff, students, carers and families (dementia in general hospitals - despite numerous initiatives). Trauma has its place in the mental health chapter (and in current literature), but again the challenge of psychoses, anorexia are missed opportunities to reveal the potential and delivery of the Person-Centered Practice Framework.
Since the book's publication with its stress on the welfare and well-being of staff and educators too, the need to make explicit the politics in health is even more extreme. The need to protect the title of 'nurse'; mis-information generally and relating to COVID. Person-centred decision making and shared decision making are described as systems. Perhaps this misses the nuances of a health care professional, the team and family working with a person were they are making an unwise decision (pp.83-92). Another chapter indicates the need and utility of disciplinary bridges:
Chapter 17: Socio-political context in Person-centred Practice
|
| MIND :: Parity - |
- of esteem :: BODY |
| Culture Child - Parent - Guardian FAMILY SOCIO - |
Refugees Homeless title of 'nurse'* mis-information Organisational culture? - POLITICAL |
One more to follow with many thanks to the publisher for the review copy.
Fundamentals of Person-Centred Healthcare Practice, McCormack, B., McCance, T., Bulley, C., Brown, D., McMillan, A, Martin,S. (Eds.). ISBN: 978-1-119-53308-5 February 2021 Wiley-Blackwell.
* https://twitter.com/hashtag/ProtectNurse?src=hashtag_click
orcid.org/0000-0002-0192-8965