Hodges' Model: Welcome to the QUAD: Brexit

Hodges' model is a conceptual framework to support reflection and critical thinking. Situated, the model can help integrate all disciplines (academic and professional). Amid news items, are posts that illustrate the scope and application of the model. A bibliography and A4 template are provided in the sidebar. Welcome to the QUAD ...

Showing posts with label Brexit. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Brexit. Show all posts

Tuesday, December 26, 2023

Immigration - in Hodges' model

 Individual
  |
     INTERPERSONAL    :     SCIENCES               
HUMANISTIC --------------------------------------  MECHANISTIC      
SOCIOLOGY  :   POLITICAL 
|
GROUP

You - have seen nothing yet ...?

"One of the key ideas behind Brexit was to 'take back control' of immigration. Back in 2010, David Cameron pledged to bring net migration to under 100,000 a year, but the promise was never met. ...

However, in the post-Brexit years, immigration has soared to unprecedented levels. Net immigration, which hovered around 200,000 in pre-Brexit years skyrocketed to an all-time high of 745,000 in 2022." p.10.

We - have seen nothing yet ...?
How Migration Really Works


Hass, H. de., The Necessity of Immigration, BIG ISSUE, 4 December 2023. Issue 1593, pp.10-11.

Saturday, March 11, 2023

ICT and Brexit Change Survey – Extended deadline

Date:    Fri, 10 Mar 2023 09:16:49 +0000
From:    e.lomas AT UCL.AC.UK
Subject: ICT and Brexit change survey – extended deadline

Apologies for cross posting
We have been asked to extend this survey (https://opinio.ucl.ac.uk/s?s=80453) for a further month in line with the time previous surveys ran. It will therefore close on Tuesday 11th April straight after Easter. This is because a lot of people are part way through and in addition a number of people had not seen the save button which appears at the bottom of each survey page. We would further note that the survey is intended to be neither remain or leave in its questioning – both sides have queried this. We are keen to understand perspectives of the ICT/information sectors following Brexit. We appreciate everyone’s time and perspectives on this. Below is the original text when posted with an update on timeframes…

Brexit has been a significant change for the UK and EU, including in the contexts of  the ICT sector and those who manage information, whether in the public or private sectors. At the three-year departure point we are seeking the views of information professionals on the shifting opportunities and threats for the ICT/information sector in the light of Brexit. Whilst Brexit was a UK decision, it has had potentially global ramifications and therefore we are looking to draw in perspectives from across the globe. We understand that there will be differing views both negative and positive – we want to hear all these perspectives.

We would be so grateful if you would respond to this survey at  - it will take 10-20 minutes to complete depending on if you just check the multiple-choice boxes or if you wish to share further written comments. All questions are optional. The survey is anonymous and no IP addresses are being collected. We know that you are busy and appreciate your time. The survey will close on 11th April 2023.

Please do forward on this email so that we can reach as many people as possible and tweet:

Please complete survey on information/ICT professionals’ views on Brexit and  change https://opinio.ucl.ac.uk/s?s=80453 #Brexit #ICT

The results of this survey will be published in an open access form. Please note this survey follows four earlier surveys charting change through the Brexit process, the first immediately after the Referendum (written up at: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0186452), one at a mid-point which was accompanied by workshops (written up at: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0227089) and the others from the transition points onwards. Whether or not you have completed any earlier surveys, we would appreciate your input now. This is likely to be the last survey we publish tracing the changes.

The research is a partnership between the iSchools at UCL (Dr Elizabeth Lomas) and Northumbria University (Emerita Professor Julie McLeod). The survey is being facilitated by Dr Elizabeth Lomas (mailto:e.lomas AT ucl.ac.uk).

Thank you for your help.

Elizabeth and Julie

Dr Elizabeth Lomas
University College London
Email: e.lomas AT ucl.ac.uk

Emerita Professor Julie McLeod
Northumbria University
Email: julie.mcleod AT northumbria.ac.uk

My source:
www.jiscmail.ac.uk/FREEDOM-OF-INFORMATION
a mailing list hosted by www.jiscmail.ac.uk

Wednesday, October 26, 2022

Reflection = 'navel gazing'?

Individual and Collective reflection ...

THE NEED FOR HOLISTIC BANDWIDTH


 INDIVIDUAL
|
 INTERPERSONAL    :     SCIENCES               
HUMANISTIC --------------------------------------  MECHANISTIC      
SOCIOLOGY  :   POLITICAL 
|
GROUP

Reflection

Critique of reflective practice

Risk of navel gazing




"GLOBAL BRITAIN"

'Rules-based order' in the 21st C?

Government - Governance

Preoccupation with COVID-19, Brexit ...

"We have not had enough bandwidth to deal
with International issues to use our position on the security council and in the G7 ..."
Jeremy Bowen

Risk of navel gazing*


BBC Radio 4, Today, 25 October 2022 c.0816. Jeremy Bowen, International Editor.


Related:

Horta, H., Veloso, F., & Grediaga, R. (2010). Navel gazing: Academic inbreeding and scientific productivity. Management Science, 56(3), 41.

Ronald J. Pelias. (2009). Pledging Personal Allegiance to Qualitative Inquiry. International Review of Qualitative Research, 2(3), 351–356. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1525/irqr.2009.2.3.351

*A constant consideration here.

 

Tuesday, October 22, 2019

"2020" A Musical (and Global?) Vision c/o Richard Dawson

individual
|
INTERPERSONAL : SCIENCES
humanistic ----------------------------------------------- mechanistic
SOCIOLOGY : POLITICAL
|
group - population

2020: Richard Dawson
anxiety, mood
mental health
PROCESSes

23 June 2016
data = 'evidence'*

Results

Votes %
Leave 17,410,74251.89%
Remain 16,141,241 48.11%
Valid votes 33,551,983 99.92%
Invalid or blank votes 25,359 0.08%
Total votes 33,577,342 100.00%
Registered voters/turnout 46,500,001 72.21%
 
SOCIETY

 THE high STREET

PRACTICE BREXIT

(Let's call it -) PREPARATION ?

folks- MUSIC -onomy

"permanent sickie"
Civil Service / Servant
BREXIT
 AUSTERITY
BRIT    AIN
ENG LAND
FR EN CH
"state-of-the-nation"



In using Hodges' model in clinical, educational and many other contexts (informatics a prime example) I have associated 4P's, one with each care, or knowledge domain of the model:

SCIENCES - process
INTRA- INTERPERSONAL - purpose
SOCIOLOGY - practice
POLITICAL - policy

https://richardmichaeldawson.bandcamp.com/album/2020

*I've no axe-to-grind, but am all too aware of the primacy of 'data' and evidence.

Wikipedia: Brexit referendum