New WHO Quality Toolkit - 'Take ii"
Further to last months post, I've worried at times about the axes of Hodges' model and their status and function. Can I let the axis stand for itself?
Do I expand (explode) the conceptual labels?
There seems to be an asymmetry, when you traverse the axis - and its horizontal counterpart; from wherever you start. Perhaps, I worry too much as if the axis was regular then the generic property of the model overall would be diminished. Is this an axis at all?
The website for the Quality Toolkit at: https://qualityhealthservices.who.int/quality-toolkit
- explains the toolkit's scope that includes:
"This new online resource is a user-friendly toolkit to support action on improving the quality of health services at every level of the health system, from national and district to facility and community levels."
psychological access 'My' clinic Trust, I feel safe) (feeling safe) Tell others - my experience.. | physical access clinic (appearance, facilities, safety) controlled environment (cleanliness, sterile.., or more social) |
'the centre' COMMUNITY DISTRICT national |
facility (policy translation / coherence?) community district NATIONAL |
Original source: Jules Storr, Independent Consultant, S3 Global & working with WHO as part of the Quality Toolkit development team - via HIFA
Previously: New WHO Quality Toolkit
'Take II'? Quality means getting it right first time (even as you persist in what you are doing - your aspirations and quality improvement). Vitally, this means you, the team make a positive impression for the person, the individual, client .. carer, group.
If they need to - they will recognise their own ability, knowledge, follow advice, they will come back, they leave not to return soon as they can now self-care and care for others in their home, community ...
Please note: This post and that previous is not intended to denote endorsement of Hodges' model.