Hodges' Model: Welcome to the QUAD: administration

Hodges' model is a conceptual framework to support reflection and critical thinking. Situated, the model can help integrate all disciplines (academic and professional). Amid news items, are posts that illustrate the scope and application of the model. A bibliography and A4 template are provided in the sidebar. Welcome to the QUAD ...

Showing posts with label administration. Show all posts
Showing posts with label administration. Show all posts

Tuesday, November 18, 2025

'Nurses and Nursing's Issues' ...

1975 .. plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose .. 2025
"The question I ask myself all the time is not can we close the gaps in practice and administration, but, more importantly, can we develop a nursing system, not the profession of nursing, but a nursing system which will weave together all practitioners with what-ever skills they bring to the system" Jessie Scott, p.1854. 

 
Nurses and Nursing's Issues. The American Journal of Nursing, Vol. 75, No. 10, 75th Anniversary Issue (Oct.,1975), pp. 1848-1859. Stable URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/3423579

Now, in 2025 we can make an impression - not just on the nursing profession, but in how all the health professions work, learn and relate to each other and social care colleagues too.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jessie_M._Scott

https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/plus_%C3%A7a_change,_plus_c%27est_la_m%C3%AAme_chose

Tuesday, November 04, 2025

Descartes - alive and well ...

... within the Incident Reporting System

'Policy guidance on recording patient safety events and levels of harm 
This guidance is for users of the new Learn from Patient Safety Events (LFPSE) service, to provide context and guidance on selection of appropriate categories when recording incidents. It focuses on which Event Type is appropriate for different circumstances, and how to select the most appropriate options for the Levels of Harm categorisation required within Patient Safety Incidents.'

Previous harm grades

No harm
Low harm
Moderate harm
Severe harm
Death


individual
|
INTERPERSONAL : SCIENCES
humanistic -------------------------------------------  mechanistic
SOCIOLOGY : POLITICAL
|
group-population
New psychological harm grades

No psychological harm
Low psychological harm
 Moderate psychological harm
Severe psychological harm
n/a

New physical harm grades

No physical harm
Low physical harm
Moderate physical harm
Severe physical harm
Fatal







Q. 'n/a'. Discuss.

CPD reading.                      

Tuesday, September 16, 2025

Chatbot therapists c/o The Sunday Times

It wasn't that long along ago, I tweeted about the prospect of our clinical information systems 'listening' and autotranscribing one-to-one clinical contacts and even formal psychotherapy sessions. How time flies!


Individual
|
      INTERPERSONAL    :     SCIENCES               
HUMANISTIC  --------------------------------------  MECHANISTIC      
 SOCIOLOGY  :    POLITICAL 
|
Group

AI therapy chatbots

'Conventional' 
Counselling / Psychotherapies

Mental health - illness

Issue of: 'Titles'
I can call myself ...
therapist, nurse ...


(New) Evidence-based

Workflow:
intake, assesses needs,
booking into care,
offers CBT based on guidelines.

Uses a person's details,
asks questions to identify
the likely problem ...

clinical
Empathy: Human - Machine

Public safety

DEMAND <-> supply

Access to Therapy: Untreated?

Other AI solutions -

validation

Regulatory approval


unvalidated 'solutions'

risk of a huge industry setback





My source: Danny Fortson, Chatbot therapists are here. But who's keeping them in line? The Sunday Times, August 17, 2025, p.4.

The online article is behind a paywall, but there is a related podcast (with advertising):


See also: 'AI' : 'ethics' : 'expert system, language'

Wednesday, May 28, 2025

The Role of Generative AI Use in 2024 Elections Worldwide

A high-level précis of the Technical Paper can be found in the Summary for Policymakers report, Generative AI in Electoral Campaigns: Mapping Global Patterns.

IPIE 

GenAI is being deployed in many ways during elections, ranging from the creation of deepfake video and audio messages, to sophisticated voter targeting. What are the implications of GenAI for election administration and voter participation around the world? This assessment delivers the first global, data-driven analysis of its kind, designed to inform policy recommendations that enhance election administration, foster trust in electoral processes, and boost voter turnout.


Based on an analysis of an original data set of 215 incidents, covering all 50 countries holding competitive national elections in 2024, we find that:

  • Fully four-fifths (80%) of the countries holding elections in 2024 had GenAI incidents.  
  • The vast majority (90%) of incidents involved content creation, such as audio messages, images, videos, and social media posts.
  • Almost half of the incidents have no known source (46%), a quarter were produced by political candidates and parties (25%), a fifth were produced by foreign actors (20%), and the remainder came from other sources (9%).
  • More than two-thirds (69%) of the incidents were described as having a harmful role in the election.

We encourage you to check out the full report, Summary for Policymakers, and press release announcement on our website.

My source: IPIE email.

Wednesday, November 06, 2024

Dear Doctor, I have a list . . .

It seems reasonable to suggest that my trips to see the GP as a child:

"What's the problem Mrs Jones?"
"It's Peter, he's not eating!"
"Well, does he seem ill? ... Is he lying down all the time?"
"No, he's running around all day"
"Well he sounds OK but let's check" ... ... ...
"Say arr!"
 (That's to me - not you reader!)
"Argh!"
"Mmm.. ok, ok. ... What does he eat?"
"Tomato soup, chips, chicken, beans on toast, raw carrot, boiled egg."
"Oh! And jam butties!"
"Well he's of slim build, no doubt underweight, but he's fine. Keep the jam butties rolling, and I suspect he'll keep running around."
- were in the days pre-one-problem-per-visit to the surgery. Even now I wonder is this an urban (rural) myth. But then it rears itself with a comment by family, or overheard. The 1960s and 1970s were a different time, a different age. We always saw the same doctor. Continuity mattered then. Thankfully, I was not a regular 'visitor', or the more derogatory term frequent flyer.

individual
|
INTERPERSONAL : SCIENCES
humanistic ------------------------------- mechanistic
SOCIOLOGY : POLITICAL
|
group

Ever since starting in the NHS as a nursing assistant, you became aware of the anxiety provoked by many patients when it is their turn to see the doctor. Being asked to bring the patient and any relative(s) through. It often entailed a walk.


I remember one instance their being 12 professionals. Learners can soon increase numbers and restrictions were imposed. Voices were raised. Patients did see the doctor separately.

Back in 1980s, I became a CMHN (CPN) in 1985, I used to encourage patient's to prepare, to make notes of points - questions they wanted to ask. I framed it as their time, their opportunity. A learning opportunity too.

Of course, humour always needs to be used carefully, but on occasion we would joke about walking into the meeting with a list.*


In case of long-term mental illness families are also greatly involved. Sometimes a case review would take place in the patient's home. If it's care in the community, delivered by the community team then surely the administration can be organised in support? 

At times, I would offer to assist and the team were always responsive. This role of advocacy has changed, transformed over the decades, but it is still there. As a nurse you listen for the voice: but have to be ready to 'pick this up' on another's behalf. Ready 

*Lists: Long a tool for safety and situational awareness.

Saturday, January 27, 2024

125 Years: 1899-2024 Free Issues at Liverpool University Press


2024 marks the 125th anniversary of LUP’s formation and we are pleased to bring you a new selection of free to read journal issues to celebrate.

With one complete issue of each journal available to read for free, this collection captures the breadth and scope of the research that our journals publish, and the growth of LUP from its formation in 1899. We hope that you enjoy reading them.

Visit our Free Issues page to read free content Indexing and Archiving.

Issues included this year

THE INDEXER

In this issue, 39.1, Paula Clarke Bain touches on the experience of reading during a pandemic in her review of Piranesi by Susanna Clarke, alongside a final article from a series on active eBook indexes. Gord Ripley and Gordon Adshead offer a tour of their online index database, Libris Canadiana, whilst Peter Rooney discusses the creation of an index for the Mueller report, a highly anticipated US government document that was published without an index. Ælfwine Mischler also explains the complexities of indexing Arabic names, and Walter Greulich continues his series about how to create embedded indexes using Word and, Pilar Wyman reports on the project updating indexing standards in the US.

Read this issue for free >

ARCHIVES

In this issue, 56.1, C.R.J Currie article discusses tenants’ copies of court rolls in England and Wales before 1400 using research in 38 repositories to analyse 176 copies of seigneurial court rolls, whilst Rory MacLellan analyses a new set of First World War diaries for the Mesopotamia campaign. Mathodi Freddie Motsamayi looks at preserving South African community archives in a context of Ubuntu alongside book reviews by Russell E. Martin, J.P. Salley, Christine Jackson, Tracey Logan, Karen Mailley-Watt, and Arike Oke.

Read this issue for free >

COMMA

In this issue, 2019.1, discusses the remarkable work of Charles Kecskeméti, head of the secretariat of the International Council on Archives (ICA) for 41 years, from 1957 to 1998, alongside Mandy Banton who explores the problems and solutions of shared archival heritage, reporting on the EGSAH panel at the Yaounde Conference. Wang Xiangnyu and Han Jiabao also undertake research on celebrity archives held by provincial archives in China, whilst Joan Boadas i Raset discusses the management of photographic heritage.

Read this issue for free >

Browse the full collection of free to read issues for 2024 >

Best wishes,
Alice Burns
alice.burns AT liverpool.ac.uk

On behalf of Liverpool University Press

My source:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?A0=RECORDS-MANAGEMENT-UK 

Thursday, September 29, 2022

"healthcare finance" - September 2022

 INDIVIDUAL
|
 INTERPERSONAL    :     SCIENCES               
HUMANISTIC --------------------------------------  MECHANISTIC      
SOCIOLOGY  :   POLITICAL 
|
GROUP




NHS Supply Chains -
(Procurement, Logistics, Sustainability...)

Virtual Reality - Virtual Wards
Patient-level cost data
Standardised finance systems





Whole Theory - The Bigger Picture - Holistic Approach?


Together health and social care professionals orchestrate*
person-centred, integrated care with constant regard to patient and
public safety and quality.

We cannot do this without
effective administrative, management
and financial support and resources.




Contents: Patient-level cost data
Standardised finance systems


PFI liability revaluation
Reclaiming VAT on welfare services


Population Health

Previously on W2tQ:

Value, Values-Based Commissioning




*Khine, Myint & Saleh, Issa & Dillenbourg, Pierre & Jermann, Patrick. (2010). Technology for Classroom Orchestration. New Science of Learning: Cognition, Computers and Collaboration in Education. 10.1007/978-1-4419-5716-0_26. 

Source: @HFMA_UK

Wednesday, May 26, 2021

The Filing Cabinet: A Vertical History of Information

individual
|

INTERPERSONAL : SCIENCES
humanistic ----------------------------------------------- mechanistic
SOCIOLOGY : POLITICAL
|
group

The Filing Cabinet: A Vertical History of Information

-TECHNICAL
SOCIO-




 
Don't forget the horizontal history and better prepare for the future too?
 

The Filing Cabinet: A Vertical History of Information. Craig Robertson. University of Minnesota Press. 2021.

My source: Peter Kurilecz, RECORDS-MANAGEMENT-UK mail list

https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?A0=RECORDS-MANAGEMENT-UK 

Jones, P. (1996) Humans, Information, and Science, Journal of Advanced Nursing, 24(3),591-598.

Wednesday, July 29, 2020

Call for Papers - Dismantling Systemic Racism in Archives and Record-Keeping Practices, Archives and Records Special Issue

Archives and Records

Call for Papers
Dismantling Systemic Racism in Archives and Record-keeping Practices
Archives and Records Special Issue, 42:3 (November 2021)

Editors: Norma Gregory, Victoria Hoyle, Sarah-Joy Maddeaux

The social, economic and personal impacts of systemic racism are traumatic and profound.  The protests seen around the world in the wake of the murder of George Floyd in Minneapolis on 25 May 2020 reflect the deep and persistent effects of racial inequity in global society. They have again highlighted the roots of injustice in political, social and cultural systems of oppression, which activist movements like Black Lives Matter have sought to dismantle.

It has long been recognised that archives, archival institutions and record-keepers are implicated in how racism operates and reproduces in society.  Verne Harris and Michelle Caswell have described archives’ relation to dominant systems of power, whilst Jarrett Drake, Tonia Sutherland and Jamila Ghaddar have called for recognition of the inherently racist, oppressive and discriminatory nature of many archival institutions and record-keeping practices. In the UK, Black Archives and archivists of colour have persistently drawn attention to the ongoing impacts of racism and colonialism. A 2020 UK petition asking practitioners to commit to dismantling systemic racism received 1708 signatures on Change.org, articulating collective and individual responsibilities to effect change in the profession.

Nevertheless, discussions of systemic racism, white privilege, white supremacy, justice and equity continue to be controversial in the record-keeping field. Wide-ranging implications arise from questions such as:
  • How have archives and archival institutions contributed to the systemic oppression of people of colour?
  • How is archival theory and practice challenged by Black Lives Matter and other protest and justice movements?
  • What role do record-keeping practitioners and educators play in perpetuating or dismantling systemic racism?
  • What kinds of action and labour are required to dismantle systemic racism and to reconstruct an equitable and just archives and records field?
  • To what extent do white privilege and white supremacy impact on archival spaces and understandings of what archives are and do?
  • Are models and frameworks for reparation, restitution and justice transferable and valuable for archives?
  • Are calls to ‘diversify the profession’ and ‘decolonise the archive’ sufficient impetus to change? How successful have such programmes been?
  • What is the relationship between archival institutions and archival activism led by Black and Indigenous people, and people of colour?
  • How is digital technology and social media impacting on documenting anti-racist action, protest and organisation? Is this documentation making its way into permanent archival collections available for public reference?
  • How has television and radio programming (for example, BBC2 ‘The Unwanted: The Secret Windrush Files’ by David Olusoga) illuminated the nature, practice and concerns around the presentation (or inaccessibility/disposal) of colonial archive records?
  • To what extent should legal or professional frameworks around record-keeping practice be reviewed?
This special issue of Archives and Records seeks to explore and respond to the challenge of racism and systemic oppression in record-keeping contexts. It aims to provide space to explore questions of race in discourse, practice and professional identity; at national, institutional, local and personal levels. It hopes to engender both reflection and action, and to amplify the voices and experiences of Black and Indigenous people and people of colour.  It will have a particular focus on the UK and Ireland, where discussions of racism in archives have thus far been limited, but invites international perspectives on Britain’s colonial legacy and on Anglophone ideas of archives and race.

The editors invite papers on any aspect of racism and anti-racism in the archive. Contributions might consider, but need not be confined to, the following themes:
  • Histories of racism and anti-racism in record-keeping
  • Decolonising the archive
  • The intersection of critical race studies and archival theory
  • Archival activism and community archives led by people of colour
  • Collecting and curating protest and activist movements for racial justice
  • Frameworks and models for dismantling systemic racism in the record-keeping field
  • Reparation, restitution and transitional justice
  • Intersections of race, gender, sexuality and class.
Expressions of interest should be made to victoria.hoyle AT york.ac.uk by 30 September 2020.

We particularly welcome submissions from people of colour, and those from marginalised communities.

Expressions of interest should be approximately 500-1000 words and contain a brief outline of the proposed article. The editors invite prospective authors to contact them to discuss their ideas informally before the deadline. The editors will also work with prospective authors who do not have experience of writing academic articles to prepare a paper for publication. We will contact all contributors to discuss their proposal by the end of October 2020.

The deadline for draft papers, for authors who would like editorial feedback prior to final submission, will be 28 February 2020. Completed papers will be due by 2 April 2021. All submissions will be double-blind peer reviewed prior to acceptance for publication, and both authors and reviewers will remain anonymous throughout the process.

We anticipate the special issue will be published in November 2021, in both online and print formats.

We are also looking for volunteers to review books or online resources on related topics. Please contact helen_kavanagh AT outlook.com, Deputy Reviews and Obituaries Editor, if you would like to contribute in this way.
--
Sarah-Joy Maddeaux
Co-Editor, Archives and Records
sjmaddeaux AT gmail.com

My source:
records-management-uk AT jiscmail.ac.uk
Mon, 27 Jul at 14:10