Hodges' Model: Welcome to the QUAD

Hodges' model is a conceptual framework to support reflection and critical thinking. Situated, the model can help integrate all disciplines (academic and professional). Amid news items, are posts that illustrate the scope and application of the model. A bibliography and A4 template are provided in the sidebar. Welcome to the QUAD ...

Monday, June 24, 2019

Book: The AI Does Not Hate You

You don't need to deploy AI strategies...

"Indeed, there are already glimpses of dangerous, unpredictable thinking in our AI. One AI learnt to win noughts and crosses tournaments against other computers by creating impossible moves billions of squares away from the board. This forced all the other computers to try to represent a board billions of squares across in their memory - but they didn't have the capacity and crashed. The cheating algorithm won by default.". James Marriot. Saturday Review, The Times, 1 June, 2019, p.13.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b01cj1s1



- to be a healthcare professional...*

individual
|
INTERPERSONAL : SCIENCES
humanistic ----------------------------------------------- mechanistic
SOCIOLOGY : POLITICAL
|
group


*for the moment at least... 


You don't even need 3x3!


Marriott, J., Why the nerds are nervous, Saturday Review, The Times, 1 June, 2019, p.13.
[Book cover - The Times.]

Sunday, June 23, 2019

Q. "How can Technology Save the NHS?"


A. It can't - on its own.

Image: Sept 18 2018 The Times Tech Summit Supplement
https://the-dots.com/projects/google-cloud-tech-summit-cover-249662





"On 20th October 2008 50 members of the UK Faculty of Health Informatics attended a master class entitled: "10% Technology 90% Business change - Maximising the added value of new technology for the NHS."




"At the event itself, and afterwards using a post-event wiki, members tried to address the question of: What should be done to make, what is often called a "sociotechnical" or "user-centred" approach to the delivery of technology projects the norm in Health and Social Care?"



Ref.
UK Faculty of Health Informatics.(2008) 10% technology, 90% business change; maximising the added value of new technologies for the NHS. Discussion Paper, NHS, London.



A. Anyway, if by 'save' you really mean 'save' then pay and support the necessary staff first then consider the 'technology': socio-technically.

Saturday, June 22, 2019

Critique Issue 6: The Wartime Quartet Special Issue, 2019


individual
|
INTERPERSONAL : SCIENCES
humanistic ----------------------------------------------- mechanistic
SOCIOLOGY : POLITICAL
|
group

Elizabeth Anscombe
Iris Murdoch
Mary Midgley
Philippa Foot

Time

Voices
-
Wartime


In June 2019, Durham University Philosophy Society’s journal, Critique, will publish a special edition on the Wartime Quartet – Elizabeth Anscombe, Iris Murdoch, Mary Midgley and Philippa Foot – all of whom were peers and friends at Oxford during the Second World War, going on to become extraordinary philosophers in their own right. Midgley records in her memoir that when the men left for the war, the Quartet were free from the conventions of traditionally male-dominated philosophy. She attributed the Quartet members’ later success to this sudden amplification of their voices.
The members of the Quartet continued to associate, work, and live together long after their undergraduate years. In the thanks, dedications and references of each member’s work you are certain to find the other members too!

2019 will mark the centenary of the group and sees a series of lectures on the Quartet delivered at the Royal Institute of Philosophy – these can be viewed on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCEQRhXQwUe-1ZKIJmnBvHsw

In consideration of this, the theme for this edition of Critique is the Wartime Quartet. [Up to 26th of May 2019] submissions were sought based on a range of topics on the Quartet, including, but not limited to:
  • The work of individual members of the Quartet (e.g. the relevance of Anscombe’s critiques of ‘modern moral philosophy’). 
  • The relations between the Quartet’s work (e.g. their shared rejections of the separation between fact and value). 
  • The ways in which the Quartet’s work manifests in contemporary moral philosophy, and lasting effects that the Quartet’s scholarship had on the discipline.
    This edition of Critique is particularly poignant due to the recent passing of Mary Midgley and will be dedicated in her memory.

    Durham is one of the institutional homes of the In Parenthesis project which has a vibrant community of student researchers and interns. For more information see www.womeninparenthesis.co.uk

    If you have any questions about the submission process, please feel to get in touch by emailing us at du.critique AT gmail.com or its editor, Sebastián Sánchez-Schilling, at sebastian.a.sanchez-schilling AT durham.ac.uk

    n.b. With some editing as submission closed. PJ

    My source:
    Philos-L "The Liverpool List"
    https://www.liverpool.ac.uk/philosophy/philos-l
    https://www.facebook.com/PhilosL
    @PhilosL
    @LiverpoolPhilos

    Friday, June 21, 2019

    The Art & Science of Health: [conceptual scraps iii]

    In clinical administration and informatics the question of 'ownership of information' is one of what I've described as legacy problems. Here's a stab at a definition:

    A legacy problem is characterised by being:

    An aspiration that presents as a problem due to its scale, complexity, and the fact that they are passed-on from one generation of professionals to another. As such legacy problems are common across disciplinary and professional groups. They are embedded within professional education, teaching, learning, practice, management and are expressed in successive  policy developments and within public and media discourse. In scale legacy problems are inherited by new learners and governments.
    This is admittedly a broad brush treatment - and a work in progress (I focus upon and list the characteristics). Here, I'm not concerned with the whys and wherefores, or the minutiae. (Perhaps this post is a result of not burn-out(!?) but professional and organisational exposure otherwise known as experience?)

    Clinically then legacy problems include:
    • integrated care;
    - across physical, mental health and social care
    - between disciplines (location, co-working - teams)
    - as experienced by the patient, carer (as proxy)
    - financially
    • holistic care;
    • person centred care;
    • reflective practice;
    • critical thinking;
    To these we can add:
    • the electronic health record
      • and as mentioned above 'ownership' of the record (as a whole and the data within).
    The question is - are the above being miscategorised? Are they problems or features of healthcare that no matter how much you might wish you cannot dodge them?

    Records are critical to the definitions of being a professional and professionalism - public safety, care planning and delivery, accountability, responsibility, research... Perhaps though the existence and consequent longevity of the above are bound to give rise to their analogues and not just their solution, but how they are framed?

    Comprehensive record anyone and is that a computer before me...?

    What are your thoughts - h2cmng@yahoo.co.uk I'd be pleased to hear from you. Can you add to the list?

    To be continued ... [ and there's the legacy conundrum that is the National Health Service? ]

    See also:

    Daniel Bayley: The problem with Patient Online and the NHS App
    Related posts i & ii:

    The Art & Science of Health: [conceptual scraps i]

    The Art & Science of Health: [conceptual scraps ii]

    Thursday, June 20, 2019

    RCN Congress 2019 i

    Last month I finally attended a Congress of The Royal College of Nurses. The time was my own: from the Sunday evening to the Thursday. I'm really grateful to the NW Branch for some financial support as I did stay over, even though it was on my doorstep being in Liverpool. I live between what is the city of my birth (L9, Longmoor Lane) and Manchester.

    I knew beforehand that it was unlikely that my proposed item for discussion was unlikely to be accepted. This was immediately obvious when I read the final agenda. Even then there were additions as I could see the mechanics of Congress. There were many more important, timely, critical issues to discuss and debate. What stands out though is not just the funding support but the fact of being encouraged to write something, which wasn't wasted as I posted my item in February (a living draft - that may have a long tail). The human side was inevitably in evidence too: accessibility issues, misunderstandings, things said, things apologised for and vulnerable and minority groups acknowledged and championed. This isn't nursing navel-gazing either. From local experiences, to national there was also an international and global view. Students, the future: were very much in evidence and Congress learned - or more likely were reminded - that they can be disruptive, unpredictable, energetic and they have a voice.

    As I watched, listened and learned, the organisation (that's the event itself...) is equally and variously: tried and tested, slick, flexible, responsive, progressive, accepting, friendly, caring!, strident, testing, emotional (yes, moving), celebratory, tiring, educational, inspiring, social and potentially a bit overwhelming ... As you may of gathered - the adage; "you get out of things what you put in" applies. As is often the case I did not do as intended and 'network'. Congress acknowledged the overwhelming/isolating sense in extolling people to reach out to the people around them. If nurses cannot do that then we are in trouble. I kept meeting the same people and it was a great support to have that connection and company. That said, the lack of places to sit at an evening social did not lend itself to getting know fellow members. Standing at a narrow bar eating a hot meal was helped by having to share the ergonomic challenges; an unfortunate but helpful ice-breaker. This was raised as an issue at Congress itself.

    There was a political undercurrent with several references and overheard comments pertaining to the RCN's role in negotiating the last pay deal and last year's Extraordinary General Meeting. There is unfinished business here. Not just for the RCN, but the government too. This debacle undermines trust on so many levels, especially after the past decade as experienced by nurses on the 'shop floor'. If that is not painful enough, this matters because it is corrosive generally. While choice matters and yes, health care is an 'industry', the vast majority of us do not want to work in a 'shop'.* We know where to find all the concepts associated with politics in Hodges' model. But, as the social and intra- interpersonal (mental health) domains have atrophied, we must ask where is the NHS on the political grid? A grid that also impacts the whole NHS workforce, social care (don't ask!) and vitally the shaping of career choices for would-be future nurses.

    Post ii to follow ...

    * How times change? I smile ruefully of how over several decades nurse colleagues have rhetorically suggested that they may look for a job at M&S or John Lewis. What price the retail sector now..? Another post ...?

    Monday, June 17, 2019

    Joaquín Sorolla ~ "Another Marguerite!" [ Prison Health ?]

    SELF - individual
    |
    INTERPERSONAL : SCIENCES
    humanistic ----------------------------------------------- mechanistic
    SOCIOLOGY : POLITICAL
    |
    group - POPULATION

    My source: National Gallery, Exhibitions: Sorolla - Spanish Master of Light

    See also:
    https://www.kemperartmuseum.wustl.edu/collection/explore/artwork/1351

    Image: Wikimedia Commons: Joaquín Sorolla [Public domain]

    Sunday, June 16, 2019

    Book: "Climate Change and the People's Health" i

    Climate Change and the People's Health


    "Chapter 3 looks forward. It begins by calling for a wider conceptual and methodological toolkit among public health researchers - one that includes systems science as well as a focus on policymaking processes." p.xxxvi

    Friel, S. (2019) Climate Change and the People's Health, Oxford University Press, New York.

    Review to follow ...

    Sunday, June 02, 2019