Hodges' Model: Welcome to the QUAD: Hodges' model: What is the Question? (ii)

Hodges' model is a conceptual framework to support reflection and critical thinking. Situated, the model can help integrate all disciplines (academic and professional). Amid news items, are posts that illustrate the scope and application of the model. A bibliography and A4 template are provided in the sidebar. Welcome to the QUAD ...

Tuesday, March 09, 2021

Hodges' model: What is the Question? (ii)

individual
|
INTERPERSONAL : SCIENCES
humanistic ----------------------------------------------- mechanistic
SOCIOLOGY : POLITICAL
|
group
What is the basis for meta-cognitive and meta-conceptual claims for Hodges' model?

Does Hodges' model have a role in secondary education and if so, what is it?

If Hodges' model facilitates reflection and is reflexive how is this achieved and demonstrated?

Is Hodges' model a meta-semantic framework and if so, is this what provides genericity?

What is the foundation of the axes in Hodges' model and what characteristics can be described?
Is Hodges' model safe? "Cold, Warm, Hot, Hotter!" nearer to 'navel gazing' than 'reflective practice'?

Are 'concepts' sufficient to explain the structure of Hodges' model, and account for its claimed role(s) in assessment, planning, evaluation and assurance?

Is Hodges' model a constant: as the contemporary model?

Are 'individual', 'group', 'humanistic', and 'mechanistic' sufficient as conceptual anchors
; and if so are they sufficient to give rise to the two continua that then invoke four knowledge (care) domains?
Can Hodges' model simultaneously preserve, protect and assure 'patiency' whilst also facilitating self-care?

What forms of literacy are encountered by users of Hodges' model and are they accessible to the public, patients and carers?

Hodges' model: Show me the praxis.

What does Hodges' model say about holism (and consequently reductivism) and why should anyone listen?

Is there such a thing as a generic 'model of care' in a multidisciplinary world?

Is there a 'logic' to the seemingly diametric opposition of 'power' as exercised here and the two individual domains in Hodges' model?

If claims for Hodges' model of universality, genericity and global scope are 'true' is this also a risk for healthcare professions and specialisation, as it supports the 'universal worker' and automated processes?