ii Book: 'Complexity in Health Care - A Paradigm Shift for Clinical Practice'
I didn't have time to finish reading Frankel et al. before WCCS26. This book has an index which was very useful, to efficiently check certain points. It is amazing the number of books without an index.
Chapter 1 is 'Guiding Principles' and links really well with the index. At two pages it is brief and yet also constitutes Part 1.
Part II The Clinical Situation, continues an introductory thread. Chapter 2 The “Clinical Situation”: An Introduction to Its Structure and Complexity is what attracted me to the book. At five pages, there was more in this vein. I looked ahead and found that the chapters all seemed short. Checking the book's web page, 50 chapters in 270 pages, so just over 5 pages and well referenced too.
Initially, you might feel short-changed, of course, I didn't with a review copy. But don't worry. You are in patient- person-centred hands here. Sometimes content matters. The three authors work and are researchers in psychiatry. For me, the guiding principles and part II provide a handshake with the index. The person here then, is given a literary hug. Immediately, there is a link between the variables of care and the structure of a case (or caseness).
'But importantly that "structure" is dynamic changing over time. We classify variables as "clinical" as they are brought into play for the purpose of treatment, i.e., the goal of healing.
The clinician is not just challenged to unravel this complicated situation but also to represent the patient accurately, including his or her "human" elements as represented by temperament and personal attitudes. What are the patient's essential needs. tolerances, preferences? Yet, there is even more to know about each patient. Does she have children? What is her financial status, her ethnicity? What are her attitudes about medical professionals. Does she believe in medicine, or even in science?
Beware! None of these factors are dispensable when trying to understand a patient. Just try to leave out a few and you are left with a gutted rendering of that person, not a living human being.' p.7.
(and continued in fragmented form below ...)
'The result even when this level of detail, is available may still be an
anemic version of the patient. Traditionally a medical patient is subjected to an extensive workup that
includes a mental status examination, in addition to a detailed past
and present history, ... | ... and an extensive "review of (organ) systems. |
Now add the multiplicity of problems,
psychiatric and systemic medical, from which the patient suffers. ... | Multiplicity may include systemic medical, psychiatric, social, financial, and lack of access to health providers.' p.7. |
'From this description it seems logical that complex patients presenting with mixed medical-psychiatric disorders be managed with an ongoing collaborative approach delivered by a multispecialty team. Included may be a primary care physician, psychiatrist, and/or psychotherapists. One or more of the collaborating professionals may be a nurse practitioner and/or a physician's assistant.' p.7
Specker, S., Andrew, R., Drexler, E., Koithan, E., Thurber, S., & Frankel, S. (2026). Development of the Self-Administered Health Complexity Screening Instrument. Professional case management, 31(2), 81–89. https://doi.org/10.1097/NCM.0000000000000845
More to follow ...
Steven A. Frankel, Steven D. Thurber, James A. Bourgeois (2023) Complexity in Health Care: A Paradigm Shift for Clinical Practice. Cham. Switzerland: Springer. ISBN: 978303114948.

orcid.org/0000-0002-0192-8965
