I am writing to inform you that the program for the Virtual International Day of the Midwife 5th May 2011 is confirmed:
This is a free online conference that aims to cater for midwives, students and anyone interested in birth. It starts 12pm 5th May (New Zealand) and runs for 24 hours. We have a variety of speakers and topics including discussion about how midwives respond to international disasters; eLearning and student midwives; The Postmodern Midwife; health informatics in hospitals, and baby-led introduction to solids.
You are invited to attend at any time - all are welcome.
Please feel free to disseminate to all your networks and follow us on
Facebook ( http://www.facebook.com/VirtualInternationalDayoftheMidwife )
and Twitter ( http://twitter.com/#!/VIDofM )
Any queries about the program or technology, please fell free to contact me.
EdD Student and Consultant
Second Life: Petal Stransky
- provides a space devoted to the conceptual framework known as Hodges' model. Read about this tool that can help integrate HEALTH, SOCIAL CARE, INFORMATICS and EDUCATION. The model can facilitate PERSON-CENTREDNESS, CURRICULUM DEVELOPMENT, HOLISTIC CARE and REFLECTION. Follow the development of a new website using Drupal (it might happen one day!!). See our bibliography, posts since 2006 and if interested please get in touch [@h2cm OR h2cmng AT yahoo.co.uk]. Welcome.
Saturday, April 30, 2011
Monday, April 25, 2011
When I visit one of the nursing homes in my patch I invariably have specific appointments in mind. Mr Smith or Mrs Brown have been referred, or are already known to community mental health services. Working in an advisory / consultancy / educational capacity other individuals are brought to my attention and this continues the person centered focus - at least at this level.
Keeping things person centered beyond that in assessment, care planing and intervention - is the real challenge. Actually there is another: even where staff are 'trained' and you observe staff -:- resident interactions you often see that (as for us all) there remain key things to learn.
I've visited a few homes to try to jump start an audit of antipsychotics and other drugs that can be so damaging to older adults - potentially fatal in fact as per evidence based findings and reporting in the media:
About 145,000 people with dementia are wrongly being prescribed powerful anti-psychotic medication which causes around 1,800 deaths a year ... The TimesThe problem is recognized now as per the Department of Health's (2009) report:
The risks, care management and quality of life issues that arise have prompted some homes / organisations to pursue this internally. My manager Christine and I are working to put a 'pack' together and make connections with colleagues working in residential care / nursing home liaison.
It is essential to check that there is consistency, compliance and that reviews are comprehensive. What blood tests have been completed and exactly when? Have next-of-kin been made aware of the potential side-effects? How skilled are staff in dealing with these acute care challenges? Is there a need to 'fix' the care environment? Is this placement - despite being the individual's home - still appropriate? What specific staff awareness is needed to support any shared care protocol that is put in place?
The point here is that it can be surprising the drugs that do come to our attention. People move in from out of area; some individuals are self-funding so they may by-pass formal services; others are seen by locum doctors / out of hours services and subsequent follow-up may be missed. ...
So here it's not about Mr Smith or Mrs Brown in the first instance, even though that's the expectation when I first arrive. Clearly, this is going to take a dedicated approach away from the personal care problem solving - solution finding (fire-fighting!).
The summary care record could be a great help here and I wonder about searches conducted within primary care GP systems. IT systems aside, it's about turning up and engaging with the homes around a root and branches review of their Medication Administration Records Sheets (MARS).
Task driven - person centered care!
Dementia: Supporting people with dementia and their carers in health and social care
[See Amendment March 2011]
and via LinkedIn comments:
Tim Coupe: The UK Department of Health National Dementia Strategy has a good practice compendium anyone interested in this and other parts of dementia care might want to browse.
David Truswell: People may also be interested in the legacy documents for the London Dementia Strategy Implementation Task Group at http://www.londonhp.nhs.uk/publications/dementia
Thursday, April 21, 2011
I've just caught up with BBC Radio 4 Midweek 6 April 2011. I'd heard a trailer that mentioned memory and sure enough Libby Purves and guests discussed dementia featuring Marianne Talbot and her book Keeping Mum: Caring with someone with dementia and memory with Joshua Foer's book Moonwalking with Einstein.
The conversation included the story of Simonides which reminded me of spatial memory and its potential realisation in h2cm:
... Cicero and Quintilian are sources for the story that Scopas, the Thassalian nobleman, refused to pay Simonides in full for a victory ode that featured too many decorative references to the mythical twins, Castor and Pollux. According to the rest of the story, Simonides was celebrating the same victory with Scopas and his relatives at a banquet when he received word that two young men were waiting outside to see him. When he got outside, however, he discovered firstly that the two young men were nowhere to be found and, secondly, that the dining hall was collapsing behind him. Scopas and a number of his relatives were killed. Apparently the two young men were the twins and they had rewarded the poet's interest in them by thus saving his life. Simonides later benefited from the tragedy by deriving a system of mnemonics from it. ...Source and image: Wikipedia, Simonides of Ceos
Have a listen yourself!
Timothy P. McNamara, Spatial representation, Geoforum, 23, 2, May 1992, 139-150.
Saturday, April 16, 2011
I can hardly post "BIG ICT - BIG Society: The big society and HI professionalism" without publicising and responding to Gerry Bolger's survey myself.
I am completing a personal research survey emailing on the use of nursing informatics at provider / organisational level. I would like to invite you to complete the attached short survey. The reason I am inviting you is because I have been heavily involved in understanding the contribution that nurses make to quality outcomes. Until late 2010 I was the policy lead at the Department of Health in England, by developing and identifying the nurse sensitive outcome indicators with the NHS chief nurses group and frontline staff.
Following this work I have been researching some of the barriers and issues around articulating this with a standardised terminology and approach, and I am inviting you, and colleagues to complete a short questionnaire on the informatics systems and models nurses are using at an organisational level. The use of information to support quality care has been recently identified as part of a government consultation in England. Your response will help understand the size of the gap in nursing informatics locally and approaches, which could be considered to support standardised language and data mining and collection.
This survey aims to investigate the different approaches in current practice at organisational level, by comparing the similarities and differences between organisations. It aims to identify the scope; range and depth of nursing information collected and how this information is used to show the impact of nursing on care outcomes and how nursing data is used to influence commissioning of services, nursing and education.
The purpose of this survey is to discover:
- 'who' (i.e. which countries and organisations) are using nursing information systems
- 'what' systems are used, and how widely they are used within the organisation
- 'what' nursing data the systems collect
- 'how' they collect nursing information
- 'how' the systems are used (if at all) to shape, change and commission nursing care
- 'what' the data show about the impact of nursing on outcomes of care
The survey form is attached to this email, and can also be completed on-line at http://www.bojac.eu/gerrybolger/survey please note I would like all completed forms back to me by 1st May 2011. As I would like to get an international perspective as well to allow identification of similarities and differences in strategic approaches please forward to colleagues internationally.
I do hope that you will consider this survey and should you have other material on this topic you think would be useful, please let me know: gbolger AT bojac.eu
Gerry Bolger's Blog
Thanks Gerry for posting this item on Hodges' model.
Thursday, April 14, 2011
Web-based and mobile health interventions are increasingly important instruments in the toolkit of public health professionals and researchers. The Journal of Medical Internet Research is the leading journal in this field, both in terms of impact and in terms of the number of trials published.
However, reporting standards and the level of detail provided in publications vary widely, hampering progress in this area, and impeding knowledge translation. While at the Journal of Medical Internet Research (JMIR) we are using internal checklists for some aspects of these trials (e.g. CHERRIES), internationally developed and adopted reporting guidelines are lacking. JMIR has partnered with the CONSORT group and with ISRII to develop, pilot-test and solicit feedback on a new instrument intended to improve the reporting of ehealth and mhealth trials: CONSORT-EHEALTH. The draft checklist is available at http://www.jmir.org/ojs/public/journals/1/CONSORT-EHEALTH-v1-5.pdf
The checklist is an extension of the well-known CONSORT checklist (Consolidated Standards for Reporting Randomized Trials), expanding and elaborating some of the CONSORT items for ehealth trials. After some pilot-testing, the checklist will replace the CONSORT checklist at JMIR and other journals adopting the checklist.
JMIR is currently soliciting feedback from authors, editors, research users, and reviewers on the items.
This is an extremely important project, in particular for authors / researchers planning or conducting ehealth trials. Please help us to arrive at a "consensus" for the first iteration of this checklist by rating the checklist items and to provide feedback:
Users filling in the survey will be acknowledged in the final CONSORT-EHEALTH publication.
The deadline for feedback is April 18th, 2011.
Thanks for your participation !
Journal of Medical Internet Research - The leading peer-reviewed ehealth journal - Open Access - Fast Review - Impact Factor (2009): 3.9 *** JMIR is top-ranked in the Medical Informatics and the Health Services Research categories! http://www.jmir.org
ERCIM News No. 85 has just been published at http://ercim-news.ercim.eu/
Special Theme: "Unconventional Computing Paradigms"
- coordinated by: coordinated by Jiri Vala, National University of Ireland Maynooth (Quantum Computing )
and Giancarlo Mauri, Università di Milano-Bicocca (Molecular and Cellular Computing)
- featuring a keynote by Susan Stepney, Deptartment of Computer Science, and Centre for Complex Systems Analysis, University of York.
Includes: E-services for the Elderly at Home [OLDES]
Next issue: July 2011 - Special Theme: "ICT for Cultural Heritage"
Thank you for your interest in ERCIM News.
Feel free to forward this message to others who might be interested.
ERCIM News central editor
Wednesday, April 13, 2011
I am writing up my reading of From A to <A> Keywords of Markup, Bradley Dilger and Jeff Rice, editors, University of Minnesota Press for the Journal of Community Informatics.
In reading the text I noticed how Cartesianism is alive and well not only in Hodges' model but in HTML markup also:
Amongst the various aspects of markup dealt with in communication and media, the discussion on narrative forms and protocol also emphasize the SOCIOLOGICAL and POLITICAL (care) domains.
Saturday, April 09, 2011
It's been a busy week:
- getting ready for the Scottish Ruby Conference [SRC] three fascinating days 7 - 9 April.
- checking with the client of the Drupal site, confirming that the following CSS3 adornments are not required: coloured lettering : 3D text : and others. KISS - OK!
- Blocks and bindings
- The Ruby object model
- Hooks, callbacks, and reflection.
Swapping to Ruby while tinkering with Drupal is not a help and yet there is overlap. GIT is the must-do within both communities. PHPNW's meeting on Wednesday on OOP with Lorna Mitchell highlighted some common aspects. I'm probably getting a lot of this (as in 'all' plain) wrong but Lorna's mention of $this and static methods sent me on a reverie. ...
Abstract classes are apparently incomplete and
$thisis not available to them. Suddenly I'm thinking well that's different. In nursing our abstractions on nursing care are complete - in the idealised sense. It's the concrete / practical (dynamic) delivery that sadly falls short.
PHPNW - the conference in October, a Saturday event in prospect and being here in Edinburgh reminds me I have this itch. Dave Hoover's keynote spoke about his career and finding his technical groove from a therapeutic role as a psychologist.
One thing I do know: from the books he mentioned I ain't got 10,000 hours. That's why I am trying to leverage Drupal and in Ruby - the Rails framework. There's an IDE I have just learned of JetBrain's Ruby Mine.
(Despite that) I'm reading Martin Fowler's book on Domain Specific Languages. Not because I'm going to write one (or like rashes), but because I'm totally intrigued and wondering about a research question. What question(s) can I ask that I might also be able to answer (or not)?
method_missing, meta programming and DSLs are still here in Edinburgh. No longer the latest and greatest (Jim Weirich suggested that was c.2006), but then neither are models of nursing. ;-)
In his book Fowler identifies 'illustrative programming'. Spreadsheets are the key example and quite remarkable in how they are used and the niche they occupy from a programming, DSL, and an everyday tool perspective.
Hodges' model is a spreadsheet; or a decision table of sorts. Basically, does the patient have a problem in each of the care domains? Fowler writes:
The key benefits of a DSL - greater productivity and communications with domain experts - really kick in when you are using an alternative computational model. Domain experts often think about their problems in a nonimperative way, such as via a decision table. An Adaptive Model allows you allows you capture their way of thinking more directly in a program and the DSL allows you to communicate that representation more clearly to them (and yourself). p.116.I'm really taking liberties with definitions. My domain experts might actually be student nurses.
I know book titles are intended to sell, but I look at the title of Chad Fowler's book above and wonder about the Compassionate Care Programmer and what alternative computational models may be needed to achieve that?
Fowler, M. (2010) Domain Specific Languages: Addison-Wesley Signature Series, Addison-Wesley Professional.
Sunday, April 03, 2011
I have a question for you - is there any irony in the matter of a BIG ICT project that was in embryonic form a decade ago - and the emergence now of the UK government's BIG Society?
Well before the 2010 election NHS IcT policy makers recognised once again the importance and value of locally based IcT management and solutions. Over the past decade the NHS has achieved a national infrastructure at great cost. I always wondered about the extent to which a 'national solution' supports innovation and creativity. Having a market, local scope and flexibility, innovation and creativity depends on standards which we can now benefit from.
There is a very timely and interesting article in the BCS's Health Informatics - HI Now newsletter:
Professor Stephen Kay and Dr Glyn Hayes discuss how the government’s Big Society programme might affect the state of UK health informatics and look at how BCS and UKCHIP promote professionalism in complementary ways.
Like the dichotomous axes of the health care domains model you wonder whether:
Of course they do. In the socio-economic-political realm we now have 'Glocal' stressing the global times we live in - the constancy that is the bigger picture; and as noted above the NHS has re-discovered the mantra of 'Bsmall'.
My role like that of many colleagues is a mixed-bag. Nursing Home Liaison plus training staff in HoNOS and shortly STORM. I have numerous informatics related conversations with students and managers, but for the time being I've let my UK Chip registration lapse.
Having a professional body in occupations with ethical dimensions, safety, accountability and other essential qualities is vital. Amongst many definitions professionalism means important things are anchored; lifting that anchor and subsequent movement needs to be debated, justified and agreed.
Idealism will count for little though if health informatics professionals are tied to the back-office. A chorus that rang out in Trust Boards, project groups in the early-mid '00s was clinical engagement. We can learn a lot now from the background echoes of all that noise. If the reach - risk management of the more adventurous informatics individuals only sees them reach the middle-office; then change in the hyper-contextual-multidisciplinary-person-centered clinical front-office will be difficult and hard to visualize (whatever technology you throw at the problem).
It seems clinically in a great many areas that health informatics has done diddly-squat in terms of non-informatics personnel understanding data, information and knowledge and the relationships between. Little difference in reflecting the questions that clinician's would ask of their case load, wards and department. Yes, with mention of 'dashboards' staff may realise they are all in the same vehicle; but they may not know whether they are in a 2, 4, 8 or 16 wheeler. [A strange and scary phenomena this - when the staff DO know that one or more wheels are in the process of falling off.]
Furthermore, the destination may not be shared, or even identified. Yes, there are centers of excellence and award winners; but there are information deserts out there in the community, public mental health, the nursing homes. You have to ask where exactly are we bound?
Saturday, April 02, 2011
Four Nurses have adopted a framework for conceptualising care?
Good luck in your fund raising efforts Gaynor, Jo, Andrea and Sharon.
Continuing the musical theme - there is an excellent NW England ladies barbershop chorus in Milltown Sound. They are seeking funds and sponsors. Good luck in Texas ladies!