Ethical concerns: Four principles approach (in Hodges' model)
autonomy
|
non-maleficence
|
beneficence
|
justice
|
Noordraven, E.L., Maartje H. N. Schermer, M.H.N., Blanken, P., Mulder, C.L. & Wierdsma, A.I. (2017). Ethical acceptability of offering financial incentives for taking antipsychotic depot medication: patients’ and clinicians’ perspectives after a 12-month randomized controlled trial. BMC Psychiatry, 17: 313. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-017-1485-x
Priebe, S., Bremner, S.A., Lauber, C., Henderson, C. & Burns, T. (2016). Financial incentives to improve adherence to antipsychotic maintenance medicationin non-adherent patients: a cluster randomised controlled trial. Health Technology Assessment, 20 (70). pp. 1-122. ISSN 1366-5278 DOI: 10.3310/hta20700
My source:
Ethical acceptability of offering financial incentives for taking antipsychotic depot medication https://t.co/kBur2XPrxr— MatthewBroome (@matthewrbroome) September 4, 2017
Gillon (below) highlights a debate that is ongoing and even more acute given the ethical challenges of today. Interesting also that in 1994 attention to scope could provide a level of assurance(?):
Gillon, R. Medical ethics: four principles plus attention to scope. BMJ. 1994;309(6948):184–8.