|
Curation: Quote(s) to follow? |
Several years ago I reviewed the blog's posts starting from post #1 in April 2006. Some posts, such as, journal calls for papers, conference announcements ... were clearly of time-limited value, even as to the degree they may document the history of ideas. The exercise also highlighted my adopted role of curator, which had not occurred to me before.
Previously, tentatively, I tried to weigh the value of content. The value to scholarship of Hodges' model, and not wishing to sound grandiose - nursing theory (someone should - given the vacuum over the past 20-30 years?). There are person-centred items, with some that make me cringe (the personal ones, the ones premature and not quite 'fully-formed'), while others stand the test of time (I think).
Eighteen years is not long and yet the change in several dynamic histories is very obvious, across society, politics, ecosystems, policy, education, nursing and of course technology. Many posts were deleted, others with:
- too many links (for which you can be penalised?)
- broken links;
- missing images / videos;
- typos ...
- where updated accordingly.
Revision #2 beckons in the near future, an effort to rationalise the wheat from the chaff.
It is - same old, same old regards the elephant in the room: that is, the missing new 'platform' - as it keeps reminding me.
W2tQ - "Welcome the the QUAD" - this blog.
Book image: Waterstones.