'Thinking outside the box ...' iii by Amber Javis

Third response to a blog post by Amber Jarvis on The Mental Elf:

Thinking outside the box: alternatives to standard inpatient mental health care

Amber's post considers a study by:

Griffiths, J. L., Baldwin, H., Vasikaran, J., Jarvis, R., Pillutla, R., Saunders, K. R., … & Johnson, S. (2025). Alternative approaches to standard inpatient mental health care: development of a typology of service models. International Journal of Mental Health Systems, 19(1), 1-13: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40247283/

A Community Psychiatric Nurse since 1985, on first contact patients were often upset initially at the prospect of a visit. Not the fact it was a nurse, but a psychiatric, 'mental' nurse. If the patient was OK about it, their family may have had qualms. Discretion was always exercised, essential in terms of maintaining confidentialty. Not infrequently, as a team we had a conflict of interest. A colleague already had a client a few doors down; or they lived around the corner. Socio-politically, there was never an issue back then with shop fronts, but homelessness has a long history of course. I've worked in intermediate support, visiting someone 2-3 times in a day. That continuity helps, in contrast to the experience of older adults in social care. It could be that the potential stigma elicited by intensive home care is now attenuated by:

• The public's increased awareness mental health & illness;
• The fragmentation of neighbourliness means people really aren't interested?

In the conclusion on Griffith's et al's study Amber notes:

'The authors’ classification of alternative service models could help planners and commissioners understand ‘the whole range of options’ when deciding which improvements to prioritise and invest in.

However, future studies should investigate the implementation challenges surrounding these alternative models – that is, what might make certain models easier or more difficult to introduce? Research investigating their effectiveness in practice is also required – are there particular models that are better suited to certain individuals, at particular times? As the authors put it: “what works best for whom, when and how”!'

The government in England has launched a trial regards people who are sick, and their work status:

'GP surgeries in England can offer advice to patients on getting back to work, including career coaching or exercise classes, as part of a pilot project to reduce the number of people who are signed off work sick.

The aim is to help people return to the workplace more quickly to reduce the length of time they need fit notes - better known as sick notes.

These are issued by health professionals if a patient is unwell or cannot work for more than seven days.

A total of £1.5m is being made available to 15 regions in England, and will be shared between GP practices in these areas to hire coaches or occupational therapists to support patients in their return to work.'

Hugh Pym, Health editor: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cwyx880d1w8o 

Individual

|

      INTERPERSONAL    :     SCIENCES               

HUMANISTIC  --------------------------------------  MECHANISTIC      

 SOCIOLOGY  :    POLITICAL 

|

Group

Career coaching Exercise classes Counselling Reduce time spent 'ill - sick - off-work' Motivation - Mindset	FIT - SICK: physically only of course! Seven days What can't I do? What can I do?
Social Prescribing Occupational Therapists Physiotherapist Support workers Horticultural groups Local history	FIT NOTES - SICK NOTES £1.5m across 15 regions Policy Welfare budget Behavioural Economics Integrated Care & Social Policy

Given the rise of mental health related provblems in the population, some might argue that increased awareness of, and education about mental illnesses is part of the problem. But this isn't literacy then?

With the standing of the mental health nursing curriculum called into question, policymakers have some serious decisions to make. Social prescribers and care navigators are not the only people preoccupied with signposting. Griffith et al. write:

'Inpatient care is also costly; even though only 3% of people in England accessing mental health care in 2018/19 received inpatient mental health care, National Health Service (NHS) trusts in England still invest more in inpatient than community services [8].'

Hodges' model: Axes & Domains

You can appreciate just how far away prevention and a health literate population truly are. Budgets will have to be re-directed. Now that is 'care-ordination'.

Griffith et al. and Amber's response, calls care that is simultaneous person-centred and service-centred. 

In Hodges' model it is as if the vertical axis, is turned and the 'individual' aligned with the humanistic (person-centred) and group - the mechanistic (service-centred) axis. This gives us self-care, individualised healthcare, personalised medicine through to population health.

Griffith does not venture into literacy and education (not their study's purpose, of course); but using Hodges' model, we can see two critical related issues. In addition to reducing the time a person is physically, and mentally indisposed, unwell, ill, sick ...

1. We need to improve the lot of children excluded from school;
2. Seriously address the determinants of health socio-politically.

'Thinking outside the box ...' i

ii 'Thinking outside the box ...'