Book: v 'Health and Health Care Inequities'

This final post for HHCI takes in -

Chapter 7: Searching for Socialism
Chapter 8: Mobilizing for Health Equity.

These themes are preceded at the close of chapter 6 with Arnel sharing some personal background, as an immigrant to Canada from a racialized background, who has worked in the health care industry (p.96). COVID also features again, its effects still resonate socio-politically.

It is an unfortunate conjunction - relationship as far as socialism, social justice, the green movement and social cohesion are concerned but Borras provides an invaluable service in linking the Capital-State alliance, which I have capitalised. It seems to be appropriate?

There is 'something' here (I think) in the 'identity' of governments, administrations - I will work through elsewhere.

Having added a note in post iv on expropriation, I see that 'precarity' is also included (p.98).

Chapter 7 gets to grips with 'Welfare Systems in Capitalism'. As before the details are Canadian, but with global reference to other welfare systems - liberal, conservative, and social democratic. If Marxism - Socialism was once feared for its seismic potential, I wondered if chapter 7 points to socialism being in a dormant state? Borras explains welfare state evolution and influences and employs metrics of trade union density, low-wage rates, poverty rates, and infant-mortality rates. On low-wages reference to the US as a capitalist powerhouse that does not provide a favourable environment for most workers, added to my thoughts about nursing globally and the US specifically: despite my parochial vantage point. Five tables aid international comparisons, with inconsistencies in data also highlighted. I couldn't help but feel the need to consider the impact of the wider-determinants of health. Now  undoubtedly, an emerging field. The discussion on infant mortality prompts thoughts of my daughter a mum-to-be amid health news in the UK. Plus, Labour's previous and renewed efforts in Sure Start; and the need stressed through Hodges' model to focus on ALL the literacies, including health.  

It sounds a contradiction but HHCI frequently had me thinking 'BIG picture' and detail. Reading 'US Empire' (p.110) made me wonder what descriptor might have been applied if written in June 2025? Social democracies are called to account. As a community nurse I am ready to support someone in making a change. But they must want and be the agent of that change. I can't support the individual in their drinking to excess - in the case of alcohol misuse/dependency. Social democracies and capitalism can operate as a conspiratorial dyad, limiting social and welfare progression. The lessons here are invaluable (pp.110-113). 

More could be made of the specific political impacts of technology. But clearly that would be another book. For example, no excuse, but BIG-TECH were clearly determined to start[-up] as they intended to go. They had a 'cleanroom' - clean-slate as far as unionisation was concerned. Governments permitted the same - paving the way, enabling and across continents. Ironic, the touchy-feely "We Care" with 'amazing offices', work cafés, dog areas, cycle paths, gardens, breakout spaces, and views. "Now, it is almost a religion: 'Give me a company until it is seven ...'. 

As socialism tries to overcome the past, and its associations; a political movement is needed. Somehow 'new socialism' sounds dated. There a call for openness in new ideas and ways to realise socialism. Over the past two decades work has changed, zero-hour contracts, part-time contracts, the rise of employment agencies and self-employed workers. It appears 'complex adaptive systems' can explain and help solve many problems, extending to human organisation and government. Yes. 'It is crucial to understand people's situations and value their experiences.' But how? And, how to 'encourage open conversations and learn from each other.' (p.114)? Neither 'citizen', or 'assemblies' are in the index, as with gambling and advertising. I may have missed one, or more in the text. You have a sense of a need for international organisation. Especially, with AI - artificial intelligence also in the wings.

The results of Erik Olin Wright's analysis of anti-capitalist movements does not sound convincing to me (pp.114-116), but then I'm a nurse. Perhaps economics itself needs to be looked at (again)? Is it an ongoing project - radical economics - that is? How does a new socio-political order 'account' for the existing distribution wealth? The paths toward health equity 1-6, make more sense. The political realism demonstrated, gives me reason to continue here. 

A brief section on electoral politics, brought me to short-termism. I have reached out to SIMPOL about this book and will share with the author.

[ Update 20/08/25: I've put the author Arnel in touch John Bunzl at SIMPOL. Short-termism remains an acute problems in our politics and policy. I've always worked clinically, so despite union and professional body membership, policy is something that has been done to my colleagues and I. There did seem some coherence with the National Service Frameworks. That may be illusory as they focussed on long-term conditions, but there was more:

Boardman J, Parsonage M. Government policy and the National Service Framework for Mental Health: modelling and costing services in England. Advances in Psychiatric Treatment. 2009;15(3):230-240. doi:10.1192/apt.bp.106.003095

They also had the attention of 'service user / carer specific organisations' -
https://mstrust.org.uk/a-z/national-service-frameworks-nsf

Last week, outside a large bookshop in Hay-on-Wye there were cabinets with books for sale at £1. With £5 worth under my arm, I was ready to go in to pay, and spotted 'Walk Don't Run' an absolute gem which I will post about soon. It links to the first post about Arnel's text and evidence. ].

Chapter 8: Mobilizing for Health Equity. Social justice: It seems the more it is spoken of (shouted even); the further it is to being delivered. We used to talk about minority and disenfranchised groups needing a 'voice'. Now social media amplifies the voice, that gets lost in the cacophony and chaos of information disorder. The 'essence of socialism' needs to quickly get to grips with capitalism as the need for 'labour' changes - is changing. We must listen to literature too: 'Some animals are more equal than others'. Class awareness and the role of unions is discussed. Education is critical. Perhaps we need more Philosophy in Pubs? People learn more effectively when they discover things, and arrive at conclusions for themselves. Use of guided discovery and Socratic dialogue have proved their worth repeatedly. This is why formative education is so important. Young people should be able to reflect and think critically. Within the education system the development of character and values too. That way: 'Workers must become political activists.' (p.126).

As a former health care worker there's a page (+) on engaging nurses in the fight for health equity. It is good to see I am probably right to assume the majority of nurses not 'politically active'. Hopefully, nurses and other formal carers reflect the local community and demographics. Although COVID revealed blatent structural realities. 

Individual

|

      INTERPERSONAL    :     SCIENCES               

HUMANISTIC  --------------------------------------  MECHANISTIC      

 SOCIOLOGY  :    POLITICAL 

|

Group

LIFE CHANCES MY POTENTIAL MENTAL HEALTH	PHYSICAL RESOURCES PHYSICAL HEALTH
SOCIETY SOCIAL RESOURCES COMMUNITY	HEALTH ACTIVISM ADVOCACY POLICY CHANGE

On page 108 is '2SLGBTQIA+' below is a video that helps:

There are 'minimum demands' - Canada-centric of course. A look beyond policy change limitations and a short review of the need to establish a genuine socialist political party. This begs the question of how 'genuine' would be recognised. There may be a case study emerging in UK politics over the next four years? The bones are here in HHCI- no doubt about that.  More is needed, so it's encouraging there is no 'manifesto' in the index either.

Many thanks to Fernwood Publishing for my pb copy.

Arnel M. Borras. (2025) Health and Health Care Inequities - A Critical Political Economy Perspective. Fernwood Publishing.

See also - reference to Hodges' model:

Iris Lohja, Yves Demazeau, Christine Verdier. A multi-agent system approach to dynamic ridesharing for older people: State-of-the-art work and preliminary design. 18èmes Rencontres des Jeunes Chercheurs en Intelligence Artificielle, RJCIA’20, Jun 2020, Angers, France. pp.52-59. ⟨hal-02897446⟩

Blueprints ...

individual

|
INTERPERSONAL : SCIENCES             

humanistic ------------------------------- mechanistic

SOCIOLOGY : POLITICAL   

|

group

Du Sautoy, M. (2024). Blueprints: How mathematics shapes creativity. Glasgow: 4th Estate.
https://www.4thestate.co.uk/products/blueprints-how-mathematics-shapes-creativity-marcus-du-sautoy-9780008685034/

Burgis, B., Bhaskar Sunkara, B., and Beggs, M. (2026 - 26th Sept) The Blueprint: How Socialism Can Work in the Real World. London: Verso.
https://www.versobooks.com/en-gb/products/2843-the-blueprint/

Book covers c/o Waterstones (Du Sautoy) and Verso Books. 

My source https://www.liverpool.ac.uk/philosophy/philos-l/ (Beggs et al.) and various.

Previously: 'creativity' : 'socialism' : 'politics'

Book: 'Health and Health Care Inequities' i

I didn't attend online the book launch for Health and Health Care Inequities. It appeared to be in the early hours for the UK. Making good progress on a week's break last month, upon return, a presentation and some writing proved a distraction. I've picked it up again, a task that was smooth and straightforward such is the style and writing. H&HCI is - as expected - academic. The statistics, politics and government publications come thick and fast. But they literally do count here.

Borras and the Fernwood are based in Canada. The focus of Borras's thesis is then Canadian politics, economics, society, social and cultural challenges, poverty, exclusion, global standing, statistics and reporting (and more) are all relevant globally. Especially as COVID, climate change, and the current state (or stasis?) of global health provision attests. The book is unashamably Marxist, but not heavy with it. If that makes sense. I was drawn to the publisher too. Well: critical books for critical thinkers; how could I resist!
The influence of Marx and Marxism on the 20th century is profound and full of contradictions. There's the history, and its lessons of Marxism as a political ideology and the geopolitical exemplars that have given Marxism a 'bad' name. To the extent that 'socialism' is also tainted. What other term can be applied that captures 'Marxism', Marxist thought and its relevance today? And that is, relevance in terms of health, health care and social care inequities? 'Struggle' seems utterly inadequate amid current news?

Amidst the history of various revolutions, some arguably on-going, fizzled out, on life support ...? it is, it seems, capitalism that goes marching on. To keep time, the metronome is the tick of central processing unit, and now the graphics 'pu' and tensor; for we live in the 'information age'. I've been keeping notes, but will begin with some reading today, which is an excellent point to 'healthcare professionals', obsessed as we are, with evidence.

'I often go back to Carol Weiss. Years ago, she said three things that go into the decision making ... information, ideology, and interest. And then she went on to say, don't for one moment think that information can trump either ideology or interest. So if you look at the whole climate debate right now, it's actually an ideological debate, The right-wing, the Republicans, some Conservatives here, their rejection of the evidence has nothing to do with the evidence. It's really an ideology ... our group thinks this way, and we are aligned with the fossil fuel industry because they're rich and powerful. Our whole system is based on cheap energy. And so we have to keep going kind of thing. And bugger the evidence.

And that second one, which is actually very closely related to that, is interest. By interest, she meant power and wealth and stakeholders. So, who gets the policy they want? The people who have the money and power to influence it. So, the fossil fuel industry is very powerful ... And so, no matter what the evidence is, they have a financial interest in not having any controls upon them having the minimum of controls. And so, that will triumph usually. So, you put together ideology and interest, and it will almost always overcome evidence or information.' p.78.

More to follow and a return here is essential.

Weiss, C.H. (1983). Ideology, Interests, and Information. In: Callahan, D., Jennings, B. (eds) Ethics, The Social Sciences, and Policy Analysis. The Hastings Center Series in Ethics. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-7015-4_9

Arnel M. Borras. (2025) Health and Health Care Inequities - A Critical Political Economy Perspective. Fernwood Publishing.

See also: Post ii : Post iii : Post iv : Post v (to follow)

Book: ii 'Health and Health Care Inequities'

In the introduction to Health and Health Care Inequities - A Critical Political Economy Perspective, Borras concludes:

'This book aims to spark thoughutful conversation and collaboration by moving away from capitalism to improve society and health. Health is not just about nursing and medicine; it is integrally connected to economic, political, cultural, and institutional systems. Moreover, it encompasses philosophy and ethics. Capitalism's focus on individualism and competition harms people and the environment,making it all but impossible to achieve health equity. We must work together to envision and create a new world that ensures fairer and better health for all.' p.3.

This sets the tone for a short 163 page book, with a page of acknowledgements, (said) introduction pp.1-3, reference listing pp.136-153; 10 page index, and eight chapters:

Chapter 1: Social Determinants of Health Inequities
Chapter 2: Neoliberalism and Canada’s Housing Policies
Chapter 3: Neoliberalism and Canada’s Health Care System
Chapter 4: Political Power and Policy Advocacy
Chapter 5: The Role of Evidence and Ideas
Chapter 6: A Critical Political Economy Approach
Chapter 7: Searching for Socialism
Chapter 8: Mobilizing for Health Equity

Chapter 1 on 'Social Determinants' provides the first of many political points to underscore the effort with Hodges' model here. If income and poverty come second the preceding paragraphs on wages reveal the socialist stance stand of the author, and the acknowledged networks. Throughout the book the relational nature of determinants, inequality, inequity, protected characteristics, socio-economics and political struggle is raised. In the discussion on wages the importance of education is described in cross-cultural and gender-based terms. The book possibly turns on the sentence:

'To effectively address poverty, we need to unite those who are in poverty with individuals who have more economic stability but are still ulnerable within our capitalist system. These individuals are at risk of falling into poverty if they lose their jobs due to workplace closures or privatization. It is essential to acknowledge that certain groups experience higher poverty rates, but we should see them not as victims but as protagonists and capable workers facing unique but connected challenges.' p.7.

For the people who follow the news, the majority of 'us' are (even if only roughly) aware of the distribution of wealth across national and the global population: the injustice. The erosion and lack of union representation within many workforces, especially 'Big-tech'. The way utility enterprises have provided dividends for shareholders at the expense of ongoing investment in infrastructure, the quality of service provided to the public and even public safety. COVID (p.7), crystalised 'difference' for us all. I came to now substitute collective for 'group' in Hodges' model. Suddenly all those individuals, many working in health, were collectively vulnerable:

Individual

|

      INTERPERSONAL    :     SCIENCES               

HUMANISTIC  --------------------------------------  MECHANISTIC      

 SOCIOLOGY  :    POLITICAL 

|

Group

PSYCHOLOGICALLY EXISTENTIALLY BELIEFS	SCIENCE PHYSICALLY data, information, knowledge
SOCIALLY CULTURALLY SOCIAL MEDIA	wisdom, leadership, truth LAW - POLICY FREEDOM - CHOICE

Throughout the text, I like the concise coherence Borras demonstrates in the steps from wages, income and poverty to investigate the state of health inequities. Once again (from i) the context is Canada, but the lessons are for all - as globalisation should/must demand?  There is public health history too. As expected Canada's First Nation, Indigenous, and Nunavut populations are frequently referenced regards exclusion and disparity in health services access and provision. Under health inequities, after infant mortality and life expectancy there is a convention(?) adopted of several axes being identified. The first (p.9) is the class-health axis, then class-gender-health and others. No surprise I found the relational and organisational aspects of these 'constructs' very helpful. As I try to think of Hodges' model as a mathematical object I realise (through oft impromtu conversations^) that we don't have two 'axes' in Hodges' model. Still musing on this; and more to follow ...

Arnel M. Borras. (2025) Health and Health Care Inequities - A Critical Political Economy Perspective. Fernwood Publishing.

^A pure maths lecturer, Gower St Waterstones, London.

See also: Post i : Post iii : Post iv : Post v (to follow)