After a first mention on page 23, it is chapter 6 that discusses "awe" - the chapter's title. I wrote (in light pencil!) 'It keeps you going'. This is deeper than job satisfaction, but in healthcare is a contributing factor. And different again to (clinical) intution (with many mentions), which recurs, despite (or due to) its subjective nature.
Within its 3.5 pages you will find 'interpersonal awe', Piaget's 'accomodation', the neuroscience of awe, and humility. From a physiological and experiences with short-sightedness and vision, I have applied the concept of accommodation over the years. All this, quite rightly, places emphasis upon the therapeutic relationship. Even since the book's publication in 2023, this relationship has grown in importance.
'The sense of awe is an emotional reaction to events characterized as "vast" or to experienced stimuli outside the domain of the usual and prototypical. A sense of "awe" is often described by scientists who peer through telescopes (immensity) or who observe the uniqueness and expansiveness of the microscopic world. A similar emotional reaction can ocur with respect to the overwhelming experience of the clinician processing the complexity of intertwined variables experienced with a patient. When interpersonal awe occurs, it potentially opens the mind of the clinician to enhanced information gathering, cognitive processing, and empathic understanding.' p.49.
I often feel obliged to apologise that the spiritual does not have a concrete home in Hodges' model. Personally, it is
INTRA- and interpersonal. Our religious beliefs, and committments were they apply. Unfortunately, the spiritual is often expressed politically: 'shock and awe'(?). Socially, the spiritual is manifest in the world's religions, our cultures and upbringing, recognition of others - in our communities, the media, ability to 'see' beauty, experience empathy, rapport and shared emotions. On twitter I've often written -
(SPIRITUAL [Intra- Interpersonal; Sciences; Political; Sociology] )
So, Hodges' model is embedded within - should be viewed as surrounded by the spiritual.
Chapter 7, 'Clinical Decision-Making' utilises the thought of Daniel Kahneman. I like the use of ratiocinations here. I do try to bear in mind the 'traps' afforded by Hodges' model. To be clear, it is not the only clinical cognitive tool I have used. For some reason, against ratiocinations I scribbled 'running the axes, or the corridors of care'. Formal training brought to mind training to assure the marking of student's work (if still needed!), and mentoring student nurses. Case-based learning features here, and in the conclusion: CBL 'will be the central element of this book and will involve actual patients with pronounced biopsychosocial complexities.' p.56. How I wish there was an extra reference (a #16) here: clinical decision-making is fundamentally political; both reflectively and reflexively.
Part V then begins (p.59) on further technical considerations with chapter 8 Introduction to Clinical Complexity. A shift is flagged from a linear, logical-based approach to mix of logic and clinical content. At two pages I did hope for more: biological complexity and resolution left me hungry for more. There is however a key learning point on p.62, re. resolution; that of suffering. Connected to this and a well made point is priorities and what is clinically important and any contrast for the clinical team and the patient.
In a BASIC program from the 1980s on the 'Nursing Process' (essentially p.11 in the book, and somewhere on W2tQ?) I'd included a woman, medical ward with chest pain, who was agitated and couldn't explain herself that well. It wasn't delerium, but we eventually found out she was alone at home and worried about a cat. Attention and listening are not in the index, but should be in all clinical texts. An essential ingredient in the aforementioned reflective/reflexive aspect of interpersonal exchange. In the summary for C8 it was good to read of constellations. Our forebears joined the stars to provide meaning and explanation for what was life, being and experience for them, who had passed, and who was to follow. Without that political domain, the meaning is incomplete, may be repeatedly mistaken. How impoverished [we are / are we] as a result?
Chapter 9 starts to present the clinical model, with clinical illustrations - case examples. The focus here is underrepresented factors. There is always an issue about granularity in how much data/information is needed for a comprehensive assessment/evaluation. A paragraph considers The problem of simplication. A question is raised:
'How can a clinician think of all the contributing factors on the spur of the moment, the point at which many if not most clinical decisions are made? Our guess is that your response, as a reader, may be to wipe your brow and decide to return to "treatment as usual." reverting to comfortable algorithms.' p.67.
This 'treatment as usual' is surely institutional in origin? Back to the 'political' again. Well I can think of a way to frame, apprehend all the contributing factors and on the spur of the moment. Healthcare is inherently situated. Healthcare professionals need to proceed with care, especially with constant reference to statistics and algorithms. Hodges' model can provide an anchorage, a safe harbour even if the visit is fleeting. These harbour fees, or dues, service charges are negligible.
In Chapter 10 brings the complexcity of the clinical "field", once more through a case illustration, a woman with chronic schizophrenia, complexity based on clinical diagnosis. The process of diagnosis (and a medical matter) is largely a matter of data reduction, a means to simplify, and provide an avenue to aggregate and group. There is a history lesson in the development of hospitals, even as in the UK bed numbers have seen whole scale reductions. Interestingly (for further study), of course, diagnosis is also a way to abstract away details. The problem is that although this makes the unknown a known, it is binding when it comes to complexity. It ties down a flux, a dynamic that doesn't just want to be free it is constantly changing and may also achieve a more ordered state. The authors try to get to grips with this, they highlight housing, employment, comorbidity and how these may prevent recovery. All this as they seek to define complexity in clinical terms. No easy task: itself part of the problem.
In the summary for chapter 10 it was encouraging to see the cultural aspects for the person and group emphasised, plus how identical demographic factors can still result in disimilar prognoses, hence the importance to 'see' the person and their respective 'self-management'.
More to follow ...
^Jones P. (2014) Using a conceptual framework to explore the dimensions
of recovery and their relationship to service user choice and
self-determination. International Journal of Person Centered Medicine. Vol 3, No 4, (2013) pp.305-311.
Steven A. Frankel, Steven D. Thurber, James A. Bourgeois (2023) Complexity in Health Care: A Paradigm Shift for Clinical Practice. Cham. Switzerland: Springer. ISBN: 978303114948.
orcid.org/0000-0002-0192-8965
