Johannes Stabius, Astrolabium imperatorium: detail (Nuremberg: Johann Stuchs, 1515). Courtesy Bayerische Staatsbibliothek, Munich, Einbl. VIII, 12, broadside, 61 × 45 cm.
Diagrammatic forms of visualization are ubiquitous in scientific
publications, as well as in popular mediations of scientific contents.
Every computer interface relies on diagrammatic forms, combining textual
and graphical elements. Diagrams abstract and encode information. They
are indispensable in many scientific contexts, and, together with charts
and graphs, also in the daily media, reaching a wide audience of
experts and non-experts.
As natural and familiar as these
abstract forms of representing information are to us, they are products of many
historical developments. Their historical roots may go back to prehistoric
epochs. However, the historical integration of diagrams in scientific contexts
is relatively recent. Even if these developments with regard to Western
cultures have their origin in antiquity and were significantly developed
further in the sciences of the Middle Ages, the early modern period can be
considered the first flourishing phase of the diagram in practically all areas
of the sciences of that time.
This event proposes to trace this
historical development in the early modern period. It takes a truly interdisciplinary
approach when talking about a timespan of roughly 500 years (1300-1800) across
all early modern sciences, from Architecture to Zodiac men in medicine. The talks
bring together research on the culture of the diagram in various sciences of
the epoch to form a large overall picture.
This event aims at tracing the emergences and the disruptions of
traditions of diagrams in all fields of scientific theory and practice, e.g.
(but not restricted to) geometry, astronomy, medicine, philosophy, alchemy,
law, theology, and music.
It will address, among others, questions such as the following:
1. Do the diagrams under investigation come
from a precise tradition or do they form the foundation of such a tradition?
2. What is the scientific/disciplinary
context of the diagrams under investigation and how do they relate to it?
3. What is the aim of the diagrams under
investigation (illustration, explanation, demonstration, etc.)?
4. How does the medium carrying diagrams
under investigation impact their form and role (print, manuscript)?
5. What are the most intriguing visual/graphical
features to be found in the diagrams under investigation?
6. How do the diagrams under investigation
interact with the text and which vocabulary is used to refer to the diagrams?
7. What justifies the diagrams under
investigation to be labelled as ‘diagrams’ (and not ‘tables’, ‘maps’, etc.) and
what is a reasonable demarcation line here?
8. How do the diagrams under investigation
relate to scientific practices (experiments, taking measures, etc.)?
More details:
https://www.biblhertz.it/3101937/conference-diagrams-in-science-science-in-diagrams.html